O czasopiśmie
Kolegium Redakcyjne
Rada Naukowa
Recenzenci
Kodeks Etyczny
Polityka AI
Wydania Specjalne
Terminy czasopisma
RODO - informacje o przetwarzaniu danych osobowych
Indeksacja
Licencje i dostęp
Archiwum
Dla autorów
Zasady publikacji
Techniczna instrukcja dla autorów
Umowa o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji CC BY-SA
Oświadczenie autora o prawach autorskich
Procedura publikacji
Procedura recenzowania
Formularz recenzji .doc
Formularz recenzji .pdf
Kontakt
O czasopiśmie
Kolegium Redakcyjne
Rada Naukowa
Recenzenci
Kodeks Etyczny
Polityka AI
Wydania Specjalne
Terminy czasopisma
RODO - informacje o przetwarzaniu danych osobowych
Indeksacja
Licencje i dostęp
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Sensory Processing Sensitivity, Mindfulness, Resilience and Happiness – Exploring Relationships
1
WSEI University in Lublin
2
Medical University of Lublin
3
Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide de Gasperi w Józefowie
Data nadesłania: 15-07-2025
Data ostatniej rewizji: 01-10-2025
Data akceptacji: 23-10-2025
Data publikacji: 31-10-2025
JoMS 2025;63(3):441-468
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The study is grounded in Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) theory which understand high sensitivity as a temperamental trait affecting how individuals perceive and process stimuli from the environment. This framework, alongside Kabat-Zinn's mindfulness theory and Richardson's resilience model, suggests potential interconnections between these psychological constructs in determining subjective well-being. The aim of the conducted research was to analyze the relationship between SPS, mindfulness, resilience, and happiness. This investigation is particularly relevant as understanding how these psychological resources interact could inform targeted interventions for enhancing well-being.
Material and methods:
The study included 222 participants (64 men and 158 women). The Short Form of the Five Faces Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-SF), the Brief Resilience Coping Scale (SPP-25), the Steen Happiness Index (SHI-PL), and the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-10) were used.
Results:
The obtained results indicate the existence of positive relationships between mindfulness and the general dimension of quality of life. It was demonstrated that higher levels of SPS and higher personal resilience are associated with increased feelings of happiness.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that mindfulness, SPS, and resilience are important psychological resources that contribute to subjective well-being. The positive correlation between these variables indicates potential pathways for interventions aimed at enhancing individuals' happiness. Future research should explore the mediating mechanisms between these variables and investigate how tailored mindfulness practices might benefit individuals with different levels of sensory processing sensitivity.
The study is grounded in Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) theory which understand high sensitivity as a temperamental trait affecting how individuals perceive and process stimuli from the environment. This framework, alongside Kabat-Zinn's mindfulness theory and Richardson's resilience model, suggests potential interconnections between these psychological constructs in determining subjective well-being. The aim of the conducted research was to analyze the relationship between SPS, mindfulness, resilience, and happiness. This investigation is particularly relevant as understanding how these psychological resources interact could inform targeted interventions for enhancing well-being.
Material and methods:
The study included 222 participants (64 men and 158 women). The Short Form of the Five Faces Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-SF), the Brief Resilience Coping Scale (SPP-25), the Steen Happiness Index (SHI-PL), and the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-10) were used.
Results:
The obtained results indicate the existence of positive relationships between mindfulness and the general dimension of quality of life. It was demonstrated that higher levels of SPS and higher personal resilience are associated with increased feelings of happiness.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that mindfulness, SPS, and resilience are important psychological resources that contribute to subjective well-being. The positive correlation between these variables indicates potential pathways for interventions aimed at enhancing individuals' happiness. Future research should explore the mediating mechanisms between these variables and investigate how tailored mindfulness practices might benefit individuals with different levels of sensory processing sensitivity.
Licencja
REFERENCJE (105)
1.
Acevedo, B. P., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Sangster, M. D., Collins, N., & Brown, L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: An fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4(4), 580–594. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.242.
2.
Acevedo, B., Aron, E., Pospos, S., & Jessen, D. (2018). The functional highly sensitive brain: a review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 373(1744), 20170161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2....
3.
Aron, E., Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and Emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345-368. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345.
4.
Aron, E., Aron, A., Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262-282. DOI:10.1177/1088868311434213.
5.
Aron, E.N. (2020). Wysoko wrażliwi: Jak funkcjonować w świecie, który nas przytłacza. Łódź: JK Wydawnictwo.
6.
Astin, J. (1997). Stress reduction through Mindfulness Meditation. Psychotheraphy and Psychosomatics. 66(2), 97-106.
7.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
8.
Bakker, K., & Moulding, R. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity, dispositional mindfulness and negative psychological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
9.
Baryła-Matejczuk, M. (2019). Pomiar wysokiej wrażliwości – przegląd dostępnych narzędzi i sposobów pomiaru wrażliwości przetwarzania sensorycznego (ang. Sensory Processing Sensitivity) u dzieci i u osób dorosłych. W: Z.B. Gaś (red.), Profilaktyka zachowań ryzykownych w teorii i praktyce (s. 91-104). Lublin: Innovatio Press Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomii i Innowacji.
10.
Baryła-Matejczuk, M., Kata, G., Poleszak, W. (2021). Wrażliwość środowiskowa a inteligencje wielorakie uczniów szkół podstawowych. Badania z wykorzystaniem polskiej wersji skali Highly Sensitive Child (HSC).Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia, 34(2), 43-64. DOI: 10.17951/j.2021.34.2.43-64.
11.
Baryła-Matejczuk, M., Porzak, R., & Poleszak, W. (2022). HSPS-10—Short Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale for Students Aged 12–25 Years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
12.
Belsky, J.,Pluess, M (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885-908. DOI: 10.1037/a0017376.
13.
Block, J. H., Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego –resiliency in the origination of behawior. W: W. A. Collings (red.), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (39-101). NJ:Hillsdale, Erlbaum.
14.
Block, J., Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349-361.
15.
Borucka, A. (2011). Koncepcja resilience. Podstawowe założenia i nurty badań. W: W. Junik (red.), Resilience (s. 11-28). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Parpamedia.
16.
Borucka, A., Ostaszewski, K. (2008). Koncepcja resilience. Kluczowe pojęcia i wybrane zagadnienia. Medycyna Wieku Rozwojowego, XII, 2 część I, 587-597.
17.
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and psychopathology, 17(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s09545....
18.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for Its Salutary Effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.
19.
Brown, K., Ryan, R. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
20.
Charney, D. S. (2004). Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications fof successful adaptation to extreme stress. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161,195-216.
21.
Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00159....
22.
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.101....
23.
Craig, A. D., Human feelings: Why are some more aware than others?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, nr 6/2004, s. 239-241.
24.
Craik, F.M., Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
25.
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
26.
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1-17.
27.
Czapiński, J. (2004). Spotkanie dwóch tradycji: hedonizmu i eudajmonizmu. W: J. Czapiński (red.), Psychologia pozytywna. Nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka (s. 13–17). Warszawa: PWN.
28.
Daniels, S., Piechowski. M. (2009).Embracing intensity: Overexcitability, sensitivity and the developmental potential of the gifted, [w:] S. Daniels, M. Piechowski (red.), Living with intensity. Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, ald emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
29.
Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., … & Sheridan, J. F. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564-570.
30.
de Villiers, B., Lionetti, F., & Pluess, M. (2018). Vantage sensitivity: a framework for individual differences in response to psychological intervention. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 53(6), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127....
31.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 11–58). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90....
32.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/978144....
33.
Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Oishi, S. (2004). Dobrostan psychiczny. Nauka o szczęściu i zadowoleniu z życia. W: J. Czapiński (red.), Psychologia pozytywna: nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka (s. 35–50). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
34.
Diener, E., Lukas, R.E., Oishi, S. (2002). Subiective well-being. The science of happiness and life satisfaction. W: C.R. Snyder, S.J. Lopez (red.), Handbook of positive psychology (s. 63-73). New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Falewicz, A. (2016). Prężność osobowości i jej rola w procesach radzenia sobie ze stresem, 23, 263-275. DOI: 10.18276/skk2016.23-17.
36.
Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045-1062.
37.
Gąsior, K (2014). Prężność rodzinna – nowe wyzwanie dla profilaktyki. Resocjalizacja Polska (Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation) 6,79-88.
38.
Germer, Ch.K., Siegel, R.D, Fulton, P.R. (2015). Uważność i psychoterapia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
39.
Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., Sharma, R., Berger, Z., Sleicher, D., Maron, D. D., Shihab, H. M., Ranasinghe, P. D., Linn, S., Saha, S., Bass, E. B., & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA internal medicine, 174(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamain....
40.
Greven, C.U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E.N., Fox, E., …, Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neub....
41.
Growiec, K. (2015). Ile szczęścia dają nam inni ludzie? Więzi społeczne a dobrostan psychiczny. Warszawa: PWN.
43.
Hofmann, S., Grossman, P., Hinton, D. (2011). Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1126-1132.
45.
Iimura, S., & Kibe, C. (2020). Highly Sensitive Adolescent Benefits in Positive School Transitions: Evidence for Vantage Sensitivity in Japanese High-Schoolers. Developmental Psychology, 56(8), 1565–1581. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000991.
46.
Junik, W. (2011). Zjawisko rezyliencji – wybrane problemy metodologiczne. W: W. Junik (red.), Resilience. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne Parpamedia.
47.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156.
48.
Kabzińska, I. (2017). Nadwrażliwi – kulturowi odmieńcy, „Etnografia Polska, t. LXI, 2017, z. 1-2 PL ISSN 0071-1861.
49.
Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (Eds.). (2008). Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward. Oxford University Press.
50.
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/174397....
51.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/278706....
52.
Kibe C, Suzuki M, Hirano M, Boniwell I (2020) Sensory processing sensitivity and culturally modified resilience education: Differential susceptibility in Japanese adolescents. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0239002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
53.
Konaszewski, K., Kwadrans, Ł (2018). Zasoby osobiste młodzieży nieprzystosowanej społecznie. Uwarunkowania środowiskowe. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
54.
Konaszewski, K., Kwadrans, Ł. (2017). Prężność psychiczna a wsparcie społeczne w grupie młodzieży nieprzystosowanej. Badania pilotażowe. Resocjalizacja Polska, (13), 163-173.
55.
Lafraire, J., Rioux, C., Giboreau, A., & Picard, D. (2016). Food rejections in children: Cognitive and social/environmental factors involved in food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior. Appetite, 96, 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appe....
56.
Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T., McGarvey, M., Quinn, B. T., Dusek, J. A., Benson, H., Rauch, S. L., Moore, C. I., & Fischl, B. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport, 16(17), 1893–1897. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr....
57.
Letzring, T., Block, J., Funder, D. (2005). Ego-control and ego-resiliency: Generalization of a self-report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicans and self. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(4), 395-422.
58.
Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1), 24. DOI: 10.1038/ s41398-017-0090-6.
59.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8....
60.
Luthar, S., Brown, J.P. (2007). Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: prevailing paradigms, possibilities and priorities for the future. Development and Psychopathology 19, 931-955.
61.
Luthar, S., Cicchetti, D., Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
63.
Masten, A.S (2004). Regulatory processes, risk, and resilience in adolescent development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1021, 310-319.
64.
Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic. American Psychologist, Vol. 56, Number 3, 227-238.
65.
Masten, A.S., Obradović, J. (2008). Resilience in developing system: Progress and promise as the fourth waves rises. Development and Psychopathology 19,921-930.
66.
Mesmer-Magnus, J., Manapragada, A., Viswesvaran, C., & Allen, J. W. (2017). Trait mindfulness at work: A meta-analysis of the personal and professional correlates of trait mindfulness. Human Performance, 30(2-3), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/089592....
67.
Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
68.
Moore, A., Gruber, T., Derose, J., Malinowski, P. (2012). Regular brief mindfulness meditation practice improves electrophysiological markers of attention control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6,ArtID18.
69.
Moorjani, A (2021), Sensitive is the New Strong. The Power of Empaths In an Increasingly Harsh World. Hodder & Stoughton.
70.
Ogińska-Bulik, N., & Juczyński, Z. (2008). Pomiar prężności–narzędzie do badania pozytywnych zasobów osobistych. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 3, 67–76.
71.
Oleś, P., Drat-Ruszczak, K. (2008). Osobowość. W: J. Strelau, D. Doliński (red.), Psychologia, t. 1 (rozdz. 8, 651-764). Gdańsk: GWP.
72.
Ostaszewski, K. (2008). Czynniki ryzyka i czynniki chroniące w zachowaniach ryzykownych dzieci i młodzieży. W: J. Mazur i wsp. Czynniki chroniące młodzież 15-letnią przed podejmowaniem zachowań ryzykownych. Instytut Matki i Dziecka. Zakład Ochrony i Promocji Zdrowia Dzieci i Młodzieży, Warszawa, 19-46.
73.
Ostaszewski, K. (2010). Badania warszawskich gimnazjalistów. Koncepcja i metoda. W: Okulicz-Kozaryn, K., Ostaszesski, K. (red.) (2010). Promocja zdrowia psychicznego badania i działania w Polsce. Część II. Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii, Warszawa.
74.
Paśniewska-Kuć, Z. (2014). W obronie nadwrażliwych. Przesłanie dla psychologów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Dispicio.
75.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association.
76.
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901–916. DOI: 10.1037/a0030196.
77.
Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K.J, Krapohl, E., Aron, E.N., Aron, A. (2017). Environmental Sensitivity in Children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and Identification of Sensitivity Groups. Developmental Psychology, 54(1), 51-70, DOI: 10.1037/dev0000406.
78.
Radoń, S. (2020). Uważność i jej pomiar. W: J. Cieciuch (red.), Studia Psychologica: Theoria et Praxis, 20(1), 5-19. https://doi.10.21697/sp.2020.2....
79.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
80.
Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
81.
Salzberg, S. (2011). Real happiness: The power of meditation. New York: Work-man.
83.
Sedlmeier, P., Eberth, J. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analisis. Mindfulness 3(3), 174-189.
84.
Seligman, M. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being. New York: Atria Books.
85.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.
86.
Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-0....
87.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-0....
88.
Shroevers, M. J., Brandsma, R., Is learning mindfulness associated with improved affect after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy?, Britisch Journal of Psychology, nr 101/2010, s.95-107.
89.
Smith, A. (with Jones, J., & Kurlbaum, J.) (2010). Winning the H Factor: The Secrets of Happy Schools. London: Continuum.
90.
Synnestvedt, A. (2006). Out in the Air: The Cultural Heritage Site as an Arena for Archaeology, Health, Pedagogy and Fun. Current Swedish Archaeology, 14(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2....
91.
Szpunar, M. (2018). (Nie) potrzebna wrażliwość. Kraków: Instytut Dziennikarstwa, Mediów i Komunikacji Społecznej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
92.
Tang, Y. Y., Lu, Q., Geng, X., Stein, E. A., Yang, Y., & Posner, M. I. (2010). Short-term meditation induces white matter changes in the anterior cingulate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(35), 15649–15652. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1....
93.
Tang, YY., Hölzel, B. & Posner, M. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 213–225. doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916.
94.
Teper, R., Segal, Z. V., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Meditation, mindfulness and executive control: the importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 85–92.
95.
Tillmann, T., Bertrams, A., El Matany, K., & Lionetti, F. (2021). Replication of the existence of three sensitivity groups in a sample of German adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 131–143. DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2020.1763791.
97.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333.
98.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
99.
Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/174397....
100.
Westen, D. (1999). Psychology: Mind, brain and culture (wyd. 2). New York: Wiley.
101.
Williams, M., Penman, D. (2014). Mindfulness. Trening uważności. Warszawa: Samo Sedno.
102.
Wojciszke, J. (2010a). Sprawczość i wspólnotowość: Podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego. Psychologia Społeczna, 5(2), 1-14.
103.
World Health Organization. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409. doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K.
104.
Yano, K., & Oishi, K. (2021). Replication of the three sensitivity groups and investigation of their characteristics in japanese samples. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144....
105.
Zeff, T. (2008). Być nadwrażliwym i przetrwać. Warszawa: Jacek Santorski & Co Agencja Wydawnicza.
Udostępnij
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
Przetwarzamy dane osobowe zbierane podczas odwiedzania serwisu. Realizacja funkcji pozyskiwania informacji o użytkownikach i ich zachowaniu odbywa się poprzez dobrowolnie wprowadzone w formularzach informacje oraz zapisywanie w urządzeniach końcowych plików cookies (tzw. ciasteczka). Dane, w tym pliki cookies, wykorzystywane są w celu realizacji usług, zapewnienia wygodnego korzystania ze strony oraz w celu monitorowania ruchu zgodnie z Polityką prywatności. Dane są także zbierane i przetwarzane przez narzędzie Google Analytics (więcej).
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
