PRACA ORYGINALNA
The European Union’s Hard Power in the International Arena: The Case of Migration Policy
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Koszalin University of Technology
 
 
Data nadesłania: 24-03-2026
 
 
Data akceptacji: 03-10-2026
 
 
Data publikacji: 29-10-2026
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Dominika Liszkowska   

Politechnika Koszalińska
 
 
JoMS 2026;67(3):587-607
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The aim of this article is to demonstrate the European Union’s hard power in its response to international migration. To illustrate the importance of hard power in EU migration policy, an analysis of the set of tools and mechanisms through which the European Union and its member states project their power and exert pressure on other actors in international relations is conducted.

Material and methods:
The research process utilises a case study that examines the military operation EUNAVFOR MED Sophia/Irini, the issue of instrumentalisation of migration in the context of the border crisis between EU Member States and Belarus, and partnerships with third countries, illustrated by the example of the EU’s relations with Tunisia.

Results:
The research hypothesis assumes that while the European Union continues to base its actions on soft and normative instruments, it is increasingly using hard power in its migration policy. Key factors driving the EU to use hard power in migration policy and border protection are the shifting balance of international power and the growing challenges associated with managing migration flows.

Conclusions:
Today, hard power serves not only a deterrent function, related to border control and the use of coercive measures, but is increasingly becoming a tool for legitimizing EU' actions in the international environment. It is therefore an increasingly systemic element of EU migration policy, influencing both the perception of the EU as an actor capable of exerting influence and its ability to shape practices in the area of ​​international migration.
Licencja
REFERENCJE (53)
1.
Aivatidis, I. (2024). A change in the EU external migration policy? The EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding. Bruges Political Research Papers – No. 96. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites....
 
2.
Ajao, T.O. (2024). The European Union’s Dilemma: Balancing Normative Power with Hard Power, 7(6), 248–259. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review.
 
3.
Alagna, F., From Sophia to Irini: EU Mediterranean Policies and the Urgency of Doing Something. IAI Commentary – No. 20(32). Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI). Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.iai.it/en/pubblica....
 
4.
Blechman, B., Siebens, J. A., Sisson, M. W., Military Coercion and US Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War. Stimson Center. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.stimson.org/2020/m....
 
5.
Borrell, J., The idea of power is new to Europe. European External Action Service (EEAS). Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eea....
 
6.
Boșilcă, R-L., Stenberg, M., Riddervold, M. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: the case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia, 30(2), 218–236. European Security.
 
7.
Brito, B.R. (2010). Hard, soft or smart power: conceptual discussion or strategic definition?, 1(1), 112–114. Notes and Reflections, JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations.
 
8.
Bull, H. (1982). Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?, 21(2), 149–170. Journal of Common Market Studies.
 
9.
Cárdenas Alaminos, N. (2023). The militarization of Mexico’s migration deterrence policy, 24(126), Estudios Fronterizos.
 
10.
Carr, E.H. (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis: 1919–1939, London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.
 
11.
Cusumano, E. (2018). Migrant rescue as organized hypocrisy: EU maritime missions offshore Libya between humanitarianism and border control, 54(1), 3–24. Cooperation and Conflict.
 
12.
De Coninck, J. (2023). Effective Remedies for Human Rights Violations in EU CSDP Military Missions: Smoke and Mirrors in Human Rights Adjudication?, 24(2), 342–363. German Law Journal.
 
13.
DiploFoundation, Hard diplomacy. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.diplomacy.edu/topi....
 
14.
Dyner, A. M., The Border Crisis as an Example of Hybrid Warfare. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.pism.pl/publicatio....
 
15.
European External Action Service, HR/VP Borrell in India: Europeans are beginning to realise that we have to learn to talk the language of power. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eea....
 
16.
European Commission, EU support to partner countries on migration and forced displacement. Accessed 10.08.2025 from https://enlargement.ec.europa.....
 
17.
European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), Mediterranean: NGOs Calling for End of the Political Harassment Against Search & Rescue Amid Ongoing Deadly Crossings, More Documentations of Pullback Cases by EU-funded Libyan Coastguard as EU-Tunisia Deal Continues to Receive Criticism. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://ecre.org/mediterranean....
 
18.
Fijałkowski, Ł., Polus, A. (2014). Krytyczne spojrzenie na pojęcie soft power Josepha S. Nye’a w stosunkach międzynarodowych, in: K. Kącka (ed.), Stosunki międzynarodowe – wokół zagadnień teoretycznych, 255-274. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
 
19.
Juncker, J.-C., State of the Union Address 2016: Towards a better Europe – a Europe that protects, empowers and defends. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://ec.europa.eu/commissio....
 
20.
Juncos, A.E., Pratt, S.F. (2025). A pragmatist theory of power: understanding the EU’s transformation and security response to Russia’s war in Ukraine, 23, 652–670, Comparative European Politics.
 
21.
Koinova, M. (2024). Power and informality in the polycentric governing of transit and irregular migration on EU’s eastern border with Belarus, 51(2), 501–525, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.
 
22.
Lehmann, J., Dimitriadi, A., The Tunisian Red Flag: Lessons from the EU–Tunisia Strategic Partnership for the External Dimension of EU Asylum Policy. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://gppi.net/assets/ASILE_....
 
23.
Liszkowska, D. (2023). Procesy sekurytyzacji i desekurytyzacji migracji w Polsce w kontekście migracji z Ukrainy po wybuchu wojny rosyjsko-ukraińskiej (2022), 76(2), 90–112, Sprawy Międzynarodowe.
 
24.
Łoś, R. (2014). Soft power we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych, in: K. Kącka (ed.), Stosunki międzynarodowe – wokół zagadnień teoretycznych, 235-253. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
 
25.
Łoś, R. (2018). Soft power – definicja, źródła i sposób oddziaływania, 46(1), 131-148, Studia Polityczne.
 
26.
Mantini, G., A EU Naval Mission Without a Navy: The Paradox of Operation Sophia. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.iai.it/en/pubblica....
 
27.
McCormack, K., Gilbert, E. (2022). The geopolitics of militarism and humanitarianism, 46(1), 179–197, Progress in Human Geography.
 
28.
McGregor, E. et.al (2025). Conditionality, Compensation, or Both? Comparative Experiences of Third-Country Cooperation on Migration with the EU, 23(1), 47–61, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies.
 
29.
Milczarek, D. (2003). Rola międzynarodowa Unii Europejskiej jako mocarstwa niewojskowego, 1, 33–54, Studia Europejskie.
 
30.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1949). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
 
31.
Moser, C., Hard Power Europe?. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf6....
 
32.
Nogueira Pinto, T., Between a rock and a hard place: the EU’s transactional approach to migration. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://mixedmigration.org/the....
 
33.
Nováky, N. (2018). The road to Sophia: Explaining the EU’s naval operation in the Mediterranean, 17(2), 197–209, European View.
 
34.
Özer, Y. (2012). The European Union as a civilian power: the case of the EU’s trade policy, 20(2), 63–94, Marmara Journal of European Studies.
 
35.
Palm, T., Normative power and EU strategic autonomy. Essay 7 in The Future of European Strategy in a Changing Geopolitical Environment: Challenges and Prospects. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://hcss.nl/wp-content/upl....
 
36.
Pastorella, M., Normative Power Europe – An outdated idea against illiberal powers, Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://esthinktank.com/2023/0....
 
37.
Popescu, N., Russia’s Soft Power Ambitions. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/....
 
38.
Potyrała, A. (2016). Pozamilitarne aspekty bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego – kryzys migracyjny 2015-2016, 9, 295–313, Przegląd Strategiczny.
 
39.
Raach, F., Sha’ath, H. (2025). Tunisia-EU Cooperation in Migration Management: From Mobility Partnership to Containment, in: S. Carrera Nunez, et al. (eds.), Global Asylum Governance and the European Union’s Role, 219-232. Springer.
 
40.
Rada Unii Europejskiej. (2020). Decyzja Rady (WPZiB) 2020/472 z dnia 31 marca 2020 r. w sprawie operacji wojskowej Unii Europejskiej na Morzu Śródziemnym (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI). Dz.U. L 101 z 1.4.2020. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lega....
 
41.
Rada Unii Europejskiej. (2015). Decyzja Rady (WPZiB) 2015/778 z dnia 18 maja 2015 r. w sprawie operacji wojskowej Unii Europejskiej w południowym rejonie środkowej części Morza Śródziemnego (operacja EU NAVFOR MED SOPHIA). Dz.U. L 122 z 19.5.2015, s. 31. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lega....
 
42.
Statewatch,Action file on Tunisia outlines EU’s externalisation plans,. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://www.statewatch.org/new....
 
43.
Strik, T., Robbesom, R. (2024). Compliance or Complicity? An Analysis of the EU–Tunisia Deal in the Context of the Externalisation of Migration Control, 71, 199–225, Netherlands International Law Review.
 
44.
Śliwa, Z., Olech, A., Migracje i kryzys na granicy polsko-białoruskiej. Instytut Nowej Europy. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://ine.org.pl/migracje-i-....
 
45.
Toci, Ç., The Belarus Crisis: the Weaponisation of Migration. Beyond the Horizon. Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://behorizon.org/the-bela....
 
46.
Topak, Ö.E., Vives, L. (2020). A comparative analysis of migration control strategies along the Western and Eastern Mediterranean routes: Sovereign interventions through militarization and deportation, 8(1), 66-89, Migration Studies.
 
47.
Vos, R. (2023). The many beginnings of Operation Sophia: international law and literature in the governance of the EU, 11(1), London Review of International Law.
 
48.
Węc, J.J. (2017). Reforma polityki imigracyjnej, kontroli granic zewnętrznych oraz polityki azylowej Unii Europejskiej w dobie kryzysu migracyjnego (2015-2016), 2, 7-39, Przegląd Zachodni.
 
49.
Węc, J.J. (2017b). Niemcy wobec kryzysu migracyjnego w Unii Europejskiej w latach 2011-2016, 4(49), 273-309, Politeja.
 
50.
Willa, R. (2014). Unia Europejska jako podmiot współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych, in: K. Kącka (ed.), Stosunki międzynarodowe – wokół zagadnień teoretycznych, 277-299. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
 
51.
Wunderlich, J-U., Can the EU become a strategic-normative power in a fractured world? Accessed 10.03.2026 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europp....
 
52.
Yeliseyeu, A. (2023). Belarus’s Coercive Engineered Migration Case of 2021–2022: Categorisation of State Media Narratives, 3(189), 79-99, Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny.
 
53.
Zichi, G.L. (2025). Operation Sophia: A Mirror of EU Political Disagreement and the Rise and Fall of EUNAVFOR MED, 11(2), 113-136, Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top