ORIGINAL PAPER
Between Innovation and Threat: Artificial Intelligence in Modern Diplomacy
 
More details
Hide details
1
John Paul Second Catholic University of Lublin
 
2
The Warsaw University of Life Sciences
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-11-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-12-15
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Beata Piskorska   

John Paul Second Catholic University of Lublin
 
 
JoMS 2025;64(4):316-329
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The article analyses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on diplomacy and foreign policy. It points out that AI is becoming a key factor in transforming these areas, although institutional and regulatory systems are not keeping pace with its development. The authors emphasise that AI can support data analysis in diplomacy and accelerate decision-making processes, but at the same time it carries risks: disinformation, polarisation, dependence on technology and erosion of cognitive skills.

Material and methods:
The study uses different research methods: expert interviews, content analysis and case studies, additionally enriched with a quantitative component, primarily in the process of systematising the functions of artificial intelligence and mapping the cross-sectional applications of AI in diplomacy and policymaking.

Results:
The results show that AI is seen as a technology with great potential, but in Poland it lacks systematic implementation, especially in diplomacy and foreign policy.

Conclusions:
The conclusions drawn from the study are that AI can support analysis and automation in diplomacy, but it cannot replace human relations. Experts call for the development of digital competences, transparency of algorithms and international cooperation on AI regulations.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Bano, M., Chaudhri, Z.H. & Zowghi, D. (2025). Mapping the Scholarly Landscape on AI and Diplomacy, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 20(2), 171–206.
 
2.
Bjola, C., Holmes, M. (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
 
3.
Bjola, C., Manor, I. (2023). The Use and Abuse of History by Russian Embassies on Twitter, in Arcos, R., Chiru, I. & Ivan, C. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disinformation and National Security. Routledge.
 
4.
Bjola, C., Zaiotti, R. (2020). Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations, Global Policy, 11(S3), 5–14.
 
5.
Bradshaw, S., Howard, P.N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order. Oxford Internet Institute.
 
6.
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
 
7.
Cinelli, M., Morales, G.D.F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118.
 
8.
Dieker, L. et al. (2024). Using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agent to Support Teacher Instruction and Student Learning, Journal of Special Education Preparation, 4(2), 78–88.
 
9.
Digital Poland, Technologia w służbie społeczeństwu. Czy Polacy zostaną społeczeństwem 5.0? Edycja 2023.
 
10.
Hasselbalch, G. (2021). Data Ethics of Power. Edward Elgar.
 
11.
Hocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Clingendael Institute.
 
12.
Kreps, S., Kriner, D. (2023). How AI Threatens Democracy, Journal of Democracy, 34(4), 122–131.
 
13.
Margetts, H. & Dorobantu, C. (2019). Rethinking government with AI, Nature, 568, 163–165.
 
14.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.
 
15.
Omand, D., Phythian, M. (2018). Principled Spying: The Ethics of Secret Intelligence. Georgetown University Press.
 
16.
Piskorska, B., Kosienkowski, M. (2014). Dyplomacja cyfrowa jako instrument polityki zagranicznej XXI wieku, Lublin.
 
17.
Piskorska, B., Soler, U. (2023). Zastosowanie nowoczesnych technologii w procesie mediacji w konfliktach zbrojnych, ADR Arbitraż i mediacja, vol 16, nr 1, 59-73.
 
18.
Puaschunder, J. M. (2019). Artificial Diplomacy: A Guide for Public Officials to Conduct Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Applied Research in the Digital Economy 1, 39-54.
 
19.
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press.
 
20.
Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism’, in Hackett, E. et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, 165–180.
 
21.
Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C., Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector – Applications and Challenges, International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top