About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Ethical Code for authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Ethical Code or Peer Reviewers
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
The European Court of Auditors as an audit institution.
1
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
Submission date: 2023-09-22
Final revision date: 2024-02-12
Acceptance date: 2024-02-29
Publication date: 2024-03-28
JoMS 2024;55(1):726-740
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The main objective of the publication is to analyse the significance and role of the European Court of Auditors in the system of management and control of the spending of funds from the European Union budget. The basic thesis of the publication is that the European Court of Auditors is an audit institution and functions within an audit system. Furthermore, the positioning of the European Court of Auditors among audit institutions brings with it a different perception of the institution. The descriptive aim of the publication is to show the link between the ECA as an audit institution and the trust it enjoys, and to analyse whether, by functioning as an audit institution, it has a greater influence on the proper spending of public funds from the EU budget then by being a control institution.
Material and methods:
By characterising the audit institution and presenting the scope of ECA's tasks and competences, based on the dogmatic-legal as well as the theoretical-legal and, to a small extent, the historical-legal method, the author shows that ECA is not, as it is commonly classified in the Polish legal doctrine, a control institution.
Results:
It was submitted that the ECA is not a controlling institution as commonly shown in the legal doctrine.
Conclusions:
The analysis presented above demonstrates the functions and tasks of ECA as an audit institution. Iit is necessary to sort out the nomenclature and classification of ECAs in the Polish legal doctrine.
The main objective of the publication is to analyse the significance and role of the European Court of Auditors in the system of management and control of the spending of funds from the European Union budget. The basic thesis of the publication is that the European Court of Auditors is an audit institution and functions within an audit system. Furthermore, the positioning of the European Court of Auditors among audit institutions brings with it a different perception of the institution. The descriptive aim of the publication is to show the link between the ECA as an audit institution and the trust it enjoys, and to analyse whether, by functioning as an audit institution, it has a greater influence on the proper spending of public funds from the EU budget then by being a control institution.
Material and methods:
By characterising the audit institution and presenting the scope of ECA's tasks and competences, based on the dogmatic-legal as well as the theoretical-legal and, to a small extent, the historical-legal method, the author shows that ECA is not, as it is commonly classified in the Polish legal doctrine, a control institution.
Results:
It was submitted that the ECA is not a controlling institution as commonly shown in the legal doctrine.
Conclusions:
The analysis presented above demonstrates the functions and tasks of ECA as an audit institution. Iit is necessary to sort out the nomenclature and classification of ECAs in the Polish legal doctrine.
REFERENCES (52)
1.
Aden, H. (2015). The European Court of Auditors and Its Relationship with National Independent Audit Institutions: The Evolving Audit Function in the EU Multilevel System. w: M.W. Bauer, J. Trondal, (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. 313-326. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
2.
Akçay, S. (2019). An evaluation on the new role of The Court of Accounts in the framework of the new Court of Accounts law No. 6085 in public external audit. w: T. Curuk, Finance and Accounting I. 57-76. Akademisyen Kitabevi A. S..
3.
Anczakowski, M. (2008). Charakter prawny audytu wewnętrznego, 8/2008, 81-94. Państwo i Prawo.
4.
Bringselius, L. (2018). Efficiency, economy and effectiveness – but what about ethics? Supreme audit institutions at a critical juncture., 38(2). 105-110. Public Money and Management.
5.
Bulmer, S. (1993). The Governance of the European Union: a New Institutionalist Approach., 13, 351-380. Journal of European Public Policy.
6.
Czernielewska-Rutkowska, M. (2007). Budżet ogólny Unii Europejskiej. Stan obecny i perspektywy. Difin.
8.
Brodecki, Z., Majkowska-Szulc, S., Pyć, D., Tomaszewska, M., Zużewicz, I., Drobysz, M. (2006). Komentarz do Traktatu ustanawiającego Wspólnotę Europejską [w:] Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską z komentarzem, wyd. II, Warszawa.
9.
Fortvingler, J. (2012). Exploring milestones and rationales for the development of the audit methodology of the European Court of Auditors, 20(2). 63-69. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences.
10.
Garlicki, J. (2005). Demokracja i integracja Europejska. Studium osobistych i politycznych orientacji dwóch pokoleń Polaków, Wydawnictwo A. Marszałek, Toruń.
11.
Gheorghiu, A.. (2012) Performance auditing – a complex concept, 5(1). 411-428. Hyperion International Journal of Econophysics & New Economy.
12.
Grossi, G., Hancu-Budui, A., Zorio-Grima, A. (2023). New development: The shift of public sector auditing under the influence ofinstitutional logics—the case of European Court of Auditors, 43(4). 378-381. Public Money & Management.
13.
Grzesiuk, L., Skoczylas-Tworek, A. (2013). Audyt i kontrola w sektorze małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw, 74 (130). 25-43. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości.
16.
Jagielski, J. (2003). Audyt wewnętrzny – miejsce w systemie kontroli i organizacji, 3, 14-33. Kontrola Państwowa.
18.
Johnsen, A. (2019). Public sector audit in contemporary society: a short review and introduction, 35, 121-127. Financial Accountability and Management.
19.
Johnsen, A., Reichborn-Kjennerud K., Carrington T., Jeppesen K.K., Taro K., Vakkuri, J. (2019). Supreme audit institutions in a high-impact context: a comparative analysis of performance audit in four Nordic countries, 35, 158-181, Financial Accountability and Management.
20.
Kallas, S. (2007). Wspólna praca dla lepszego wykorzystania środków Unii Europejskiej, 1, 21-32. Kontrola Finansowa numer specjalny.
22.
Kosikowski, C. (2014). Finanse i prawo finansowe Unii Europejskiej. Wolters Kluwer.
23.
Koźmiński, A.K., Piotrowski, W. (red) (2000). Zarządzania. Teoria i praktyka, praca zbiorowa. WN PWN.
24.
Kuc, B.R. (2008). Kontrola, kontroling, audyt, Podobieństwa i różnice. Wydawnictwo PTM.
25.
Kwaśniak, P (2012). Aspekty kontroli i nadzoru nad samorządem terytorialnym, 2(I). 33-54. Zeszyty Naukowe WSEI, seria ADMINISTRACJA.
26.
Levy, R. (1996). Managing value for money audit in the European Union: the challenge of diversity, 43(4). 509-529. Journal of Common Market Studies.
27.
Lonsdale, J. (2008). Balancing independence and responsiveness: a practitioner perspective on the relationships shaping performance audit, 2 (14). 115–116. Evaluation.
28.
Łacny, J. (2012). Prowadzenie kontroli w państwach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej – kompetencje Trybunału Obrachunkowego, 5(346). 8-29. Kontrola Państwowa.
29.
Łacny, J. (2012). w: D. Kornobis-Romanowska, A. Wróbel, Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom III (art. 223-358). Wolters Kluwer.
30.
Lubińska, T., Będzieszak, M., Marska-Dzioba N. (2015). Zarządzanie finansami publicznymi a efektywność. Difin.
31.
Mazur.J, (2004). Relacja z konferencji Kontrola i audyt w perspektywie europejskiej, 4, 62-73. Kontrola Państwowa.
32.
Moggia, G. (2020). Analysing the origins of the ‚statement of assurance’: The European Court of Auditors after the Maastricht Treaty. w: P. Stephenson, M.L. Sánchez-Barrueco, H. Aden (red) . Financial Accountability in the European Union, 57-75. Routledge.
33.
Mitrowski, S. (2006). Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości – organ kontrolny w systemie instytucjonalnym Wspólnot Europejskich, 4, 107-120. Studia Europejskie.
34.
Nowak-Far, A. (2011). Finanse Unii Europejskiej. Aspekty instytucjonalne i prawne. Europrawo.
37.
Radecka-Moroz, K. (2015). Uzyskanie rezultatów przy realizacji budżetu UE – doświadczenia Europejskiego Trybunały Obrachunkowego. w: Lubińska T., Będzieszak M., Marska-Dzioba N. (red). Zarządzanie finansami publicznymi a efektywność, Difin.
39.
Stephenson, P. (2013). 60 Years of Auditing Europe: a Historical Institutionalist Analysis, conference paper presented at the biannual conference of the European Union Studies Association (EUSA). Baltimore.
40.
Stephenson, P. (2015). Reconciling audit and evaluation?: The shift to performance and effectiveness at the European Court of Auditors, 6 (1). 78-89. European Journal of Risk Regulation.
41.
Stephenson, P. (2020). Securing impact from audit: budgetary scrutiny by the European Parliament and its use of findings by the European Court of Auditors. w:. P. Stephenson, M.L. Sánchez-Barrueco, H.Aden. Financial Accountability in the European Union. 287-302. Routledge.
42.
Stępniewski, J. (2001). Audyt i diagnostyka firmy. Akademia Ekonomiczna we Wrocławiu.
43.
Szmyt, A (2019). Trybunał Obrachunkowy Unii Europejskiej, 2(42). 345–353. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze.
44.
Sylwestrzak, A. (2012). Komentarz do art. 246 TWE, w:. Wróbel, A., Kornobis-Romanowska, D., Łacny,J. (red.). Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom III.191-194, Wolters Kluwer.
45.
Tida, B. (2021). Seeking the Spotlight: How Reputational Considerations Shape the European Court of Auditor’s Shifting Account-holding Role, 100(1). 692-710. Public Administration.
46.
Ulrich, L. Ch. (2016). Roads to Europe Heinrich Aigner and the genesis od the European Court of Auditors. Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München.
47.
Weber, H. (2007). Kontrola zewnętrzna w Unii Europejskiej oraz współpraca najwyższych organów kontroli i Europejskiego Trybunału Obrachunkowego w kontroli środków Unii, 1, 33-39. Kontrola Państwowa numer specjalny.
48.
Winiarka, K. (2005). Teoretyczne i praktyczne aspekty audytu wewnętrznego. Difin.
49.
Vacca, A. (2014). Court of Auditors performance auditing as a tool to enhance economy, efficiency, effectiveness and transparency in the public administration, an Italian perspective: strengths and weaknesses, 4(2). 103 – 119. International Journal of Public Law and Policy.
50.
Vogiatzis, N. (2019). The Independence Of The European Court Of Auditors. 56(3). 667 – 701. Common Market Law Review.
51.
Zalega, K. (2004). Kierunki kontroli Europejskiego Trybunału Obrachunkowego w 2004r., 2, 104-115. Kontrola Państwowa.
52.
Zdebel, M. (2009). Zinstytucjonalizowana kontrola finansów Wspólnoty Europejskiej : Europejski Trybunał Obrachunkowy. w:. B. Mikołajczyk, J. Nowakowska-Małusecka (red.). Prawo międzynarodowe, europejskie i krajowe – granice i wspólne obszary: księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesor Genowefie Grabowskiej, 621-630. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
