About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Ethical Code for authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Ethical Code or Peer Reviewers
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
“Functioning of autonomous weapons systems
in the context of multilateral regulations”
1
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
Submission date: 2023-01-31
Final revision date: 2023-02-09
Acceptance date: 2023-02-13
Publication date: 2023-04-29
JoMS 2023;50(1):480-495
KEYWORDS
international lawarmed conflictsKey words: autonomous weapon systemshuman responsibilityhuman supervision
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to present the issue of autonomous weapons systems in the context of creating multilateral legal regulations. For this purpose, the article, due to the lack of legal regulations regulating the use of this type of weapons, refers mainly to international disccusion taking place on the forum of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, considered the most important source of the global debate on the autonomy of weapon systems and already existing legal solutions concerning this issue.
Material and methods:
Due to the legal nature of the article, two research methods will be used. As the basic legal comparative method aimed at analyzing the issues concerning the functioning of autonomous weapons systems based on various state concepts developed during international meetings, and as an auxiliary - historical method, which will allow for a better understanding of the axiological foundations of the proposed legislative solutions.
Results:
The result of the considerations is to indicate that regulating the issue of autonomous weapons systems at the international level is extremely problematic, because on the one hand, it is necessary to strive to introduce binding and rigorous regulations so that their development and use do not lead to serious humanitarian threats or the creation of legal loopholes in responsibility, but their definition should not impede progress or access to appropriate technologies for peaceful purposes.
Conclusions:
-
The aim of the article is to present the issue of autonomous weapons systems in the context of creating multilateral legal regulations. For this purpose, the article, due to the lack of legal regulations regulating the use of this type of weapons, refers mainly to international disccusion taking place on the forum of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, considered the most important source of the global debate on the autonomy of weapon systems and already existing legal solutions concerning this issue.
Material and methods:
Due to the legal nature of the article, two research methods will be used. As the basic legal comparative method aimed at analyzing the issues concerning the functioning of autonomous weapons systems based on various state concepts developed during international meetings, and as an auxiliary - historical method, which will allow for a better understanding of the axiological foundations of the proposed legislative solutions.
Results:
The result of the considerations is to indicate that regulating the issue of autonomous weapons systems at the international level is extremely problematic, because on the one hand, it is necessary to strive to introduce binding and rigorous regulations so that their development and use do not lead to serious humanitarian threats or the creation of legal loopholes in responsibility, but their definition should not impede progress or access to appropriate technologies for peaceful purposes.
Conclusions:
-
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Amoroso, D., Tamburrini, G. (2021). In Search of the ‘Human Element’: International Debates on Regulating Autonomous Weapons Systems. The International Spectator.
2.
Boulanin, V., Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Report. Solna: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
3.
Boulanin, V., Davison, N., Goussac, N. and Peldán Carlsson M. (2020). Limits on Autonomy in Weapon Systems. SIPRI.
4.
Cernat, R. (2022). Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems – Emerging and Potentially Disruptive Technology. Ministry of National Defence.
5.
Defence, T.U. (2011). Joint Doctrine Note 2/11: The UK Approach to Unmanned Aircraft Systems. London: The UK Ministry of Defence,https://assets.publishing.serv..., (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
6.
Department of Defense of the Unites States Directive 3000.09, 21.11.2012, https://www.esd.whs.mil/portal..., (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
7.
Dickow M. (2015). First Steps towards a Multidimensional Autonomy Risk Assessment (MARA) in Weapons Systems. Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Hamburg/ Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.
8.
Falkowski, Z., Marcinko, M. (2014). Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne konfliktów zbrojnych. Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.
9.
Final report of the Panel of Experts on Libya established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1973 (2021), S/2021/229, New York: UN.
10.
Group of Governmental Experts of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, UN Doc. CCW/GGE.1/2018/3, 23 October 2018.
11.
Group of Governmental Experts of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, UN Doc. CCW/GGE.1/2019/3, 25 September 2019.
13.
Human Rights Watch, Mind the Gap: The Lack of Accountability for Killer Robots, https://www.hrw.org/report/201..., (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
14.
ICRC. (2020). Commentary on the ‘Guiding Principles’ of the CCW GGE on ‘Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems’, https://documents.unoda.org/wp..., (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
15.
ICRC. (2015). International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. Report to the 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.
16.
ICRC, (2019). International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. Report to the 33rd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.
17.
ICRC, Ethics and autonomous weapons systems: An ethical basis for human control ?, https://www.icrc.org/en/downlo..., (dostęp: ?).
18.
Iwan, D. (2020). Odpowiedzialność za użycie autonomicznych systemów uzbrojenia w międzynarodowym prawie humanitarnym. Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach.
19.
Jenks, Ch. (2016). The Confusion & Distraction of Full Autonomy. Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters.
20.
Karta Narodów Zjednoczonych, Statut Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości i Porozumienie ustanawiające Komisję Przygotowawczą Narodów Zjednoczonych z 1945 roku, ratyfikowana przez Polskę, Dz.U. 1947 nr 23, poz. 90.
21.
Klare M., Conference Makes No Progress on Robotic Weapons, https://www.armscontrol.org/ac..., (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
22.
Konwencja o zakazie lub ograniczeniu użycia pewnych broni konwencjonalnych, które mogą być uważane za powodujące nadmierne cierpienia lub mające niekontrolowane skutki, wraz z załącznikami, sporządzona w Genewie dnia 10 października 1980 r., Dz.U.1984.23.104.
24.
Kowalczewska, K. (2021). Sztuczna inteligencja na wojnie. Perspektywa Międzynarodowego Prawa Humanitarnego Konfliktów Zbrojnych. Przypadek autonomicznych systemów śmiercionośnej broni, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
25.
Kreβ, C. (2016). Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, Cambridge University Press.
26.
Marszałek, P.K. (2019). Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne konfliktów zbrojnych. C.H. Beck.
27.
Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, Final report, UN Doc. CCW/MSP/2019/9, 13 December 2019. The guiding principles are contained in Annex III of the Final report of the Meeting of the High Contracting Parties.
28.
Moyes, R. (2019). Article 36 Critical Commentary on the „Guiding Principles”. Political Note.
29.
OCHA, Autonomous weapons: The ICRC calls on states to take steps towards treaty negotiations, https://reliefweb.int/report/w..., (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
30.
Österdahl, I. (2022). Laws on LAWS (Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems): The Work of the United Nations and the Swedish Position.
31.
Pawłowicz, W. (2017). Maszyny do zabijania,https://www.computerworld.pl/n..., (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
33.
Robert F. Trager, Killer Robots Are Here – We Need to Regulate Them, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022...), (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
34.
Scharre, P. (2018). Army of None. Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
35.
Schaub, G. Jr., Wenzel Kristoffersen, J. (2017). In, On, or Out of the Loop? Denmark and Autonomous Weapon Systems, Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen, https://cms.polsci.ku.dk/publi..., (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
36.
Suchman, L., Weber, J. (2016). Human-machine Autonomies, w: N. Bhuta (red.), Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, 79–84. Cambridge University Press.
37.
The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. (2013). Urgent Action Needed to Ban Fully Autonomous Weapons Non-governmental organizations convene to launch Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, https://www.stopkillerrobots.o... , (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
38.
The UK Ministry of Defence.(2017). Joint Doctrine Publication 0-30.2: Unmanned Aircraft Systems, https://assets.publishing.serv..., (dostęp: 09.02.2023).
39.
United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, High Contracting Parties and Signatories CCW, https://www.un.org/disarmament..., (dostęp: 29.01.2023).
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
