Preservice ELT Teachers’ Native Non-Native Language Teacher Perception
Aksaray University
Çukurova University/Adana
Data publikacji: 26-10-2018
Data nadesłania: 29-05-2018
Data akceptacji: 11-09-2018
JoMS 2018;38(3):73–86
this study examines prospective ELT teachers’ perceptions of native and non-native language teachers regarding the definition of NEST and NNEST, overall learning with NETSs and NNESTs, perceived weakness and strengths of NESTs and NNESTs and classroom behaviour and responsibility of NESTs and NNESTs .

Material and methods:
The data will be collected through Likert scale questionnaire which was developed by Hadla (2013) and are going to be administered to ELT students studying at Aksaray University. The collected data will be subjected to descriptive analysis such as percentages, frequencies and statistically significant difference will be tested between the groups.

This research provides valuable insights into pre-service ELT teachers’ perceptions on NESTs and NNESTS. Although the pre-service ELT teachers do not have a clear mind on the definition of NEST, it is important to note that most of them do not take the colour of skin as an indicator of it. Growing up in an English-speaking country and being raised with native speaking parents are, on the other hand, among the qualities of NESTs according to the participants. The findings also indicate that the participants that are prospective NNESTs themselves link being NEST with better development of speaking (fluency and pronunciation) and listening skill while they are not sure if it also brings better writing and reading abilities or more knowledge on the grammar and vocabulary.

The issue of NEST and NNEST perceptions differ on perceivers’ being learner or teacher and especially in Turkish context the perceptions might be standing as an obstacle in front of the system preveting it from successful language teaching. Therefore, important changes in language teacher education that helps to develop self-perceptions of NNESTs are required.

Ertan Altınsoy   
Aksaray University
1. Abriel, R. (2015). How Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Native and Non-Native English Speaking Teachers influences Pedagogy (MA Thesis). University of Toronto.
2. Alseweed, M. A. (2012). University Students’ Perceptions of the Influence of Native and Non-native Teachers. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 42-54. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n12p42. ISSN 1916-4742.
3. Árva, V., & Medgyes, P. (2000). Natives and non-natives on video. System, 28(3), 355-372. ISSN 0346-251X.
4. Aslan, E., & Thompson, A. S. (2017). Are They Really “Two Different Species”? Implicitly Elicite Student Perceptions About NESTs and NNESTs. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 277-294. ISSN 1949-3533.
5. Barratt, L. & E. Kontra (2000). Native English-speaking teachers in cultures other than their own. TESOL Journal 9.3, 19–23. ISSN 1949-3533.
6. Benke, E. & P. Medgyes (2005). Differences in teaching behaviour between native and non-native speaker teachers: As seen by the learners. In Llurda (ed.), 195–216. ISBN 978-0-387-24566-9.
7. Çakir, H., & Demir, I. Y. (2013). A comparative analysis between NESTs and NNESTs based on perceptions of students in preparation classes. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 36-47 ISSN 2324-8033.
8. Cheung, Y. L. (2002). The attitude of university students in Hong Kong towards native and non-native teachers of English. (Unpublished master's thesis). The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6. b.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415374101.
10. Hadla, Z. (2013). Student and teacher perceptions of native and non-native English speaking teachers in the Lebanese context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
11. Kachru, B.B., 1985. Standards, codi®cation and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle. In: Quirk, R., Widdowson, H.G. (Eds.), English in the World Ð Teaching and Learning the Language and Literature. Cambridge University Press/The British Council, Cambridge, pp. 11-30. ISBN 0521315220.
12. Lasagabaster, D. & J. M. Sierra (2002). University students’ perceptions of native and non-native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness 11.2, 132–142. ISSN 0965-8416.
13. Mahboob, A. (2003). Status of nonnative English-speaking teachers in the United States. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
14. Mahboob, A. (2004). Native or nonnative: What do students enrolled in an intensive English program think? In L. Kamhi-Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience: Perspectives on nonnative English speaking professionals (pp. 121-147). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 9780472089987.
15. Moussu, L. (2006). Native and non-native English-speaking English as a second language teachers: Student attitudes, teacher self-perceptions, and intensive English program administrator beliefs and practices. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University.
16. Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal 46.4, 340–349. ISSN 0951-0893.
17. Moussu, L., & Lourda, E. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315-348. ISSN 0261-4448.
18. Seidlhofer, B. 2001. ‘Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11: 133–58. ISSN 2472-1166.