PRACA ORYGINALNA
Virtual Reality According to Michael Heim
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
 
 
Data nadesłania: 14-01-2025
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 21-04-2025
 
 
Data akceptacji: 19-06-2025
 
 
Data publikacji: 17-07-2025
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Mariusz Mazurek   

Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
 
 
JoMS 2025;62(2):633-649
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to analyze and interpret Michael Heim's concept of virtual reality, with particular emphasis on the ontological status of virtual objects and their relationship to the material world. The study focuses on identifying the role of imagination in the creation and perception of virtual environments.

Material and methods:
The analysis is based on a review of philosophical literature, including Michael Heim’s works such as The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality and Virtual Realism. The research approach involves the interpretation of key concepts related to virtuality, such as simulation, immersion, interactivity, and telepresence, in the context of classical philosophical traditions

Results:
Heim defines virtual reality as a specific subjective experience that results from the user's engagement in a digitally generated environment. Key features of virtual reality, such as interactivity and immersion, are highlighted as fundamental to its ontological significance. The analysis reveals that Heim adopts a multidimensional approach to virtuality, combining its technical aspects with philosophical considerations of reality.

Conclusions:
The study shows that Heim does not definitively determine the ontological status of virtual objects, which raises further questions about their materiality and interaction with humans. His concept of virtuality, based on the interplay between imagination and technology, highlights the potential of virtual worlds as sources of knowledge and as spaces for experiencing and creating new forms of reality.
Licencja
REFERENCJE (26)
1.
Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and Simulation (S. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
 
2.
Biosca Bas, A. (2015). Origin of Virtuality. Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, 64, 81–109.
 
3.
Cooper, W., & Heim, M. (1995). Book Review: The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality – Michael Heim. Philosophy in Review, 15, 87–92.
 
4.
Cooper, W. (1995). Virtual Reality and the Metaphysics of Self, Community and Nature, The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap19....
 
5.
Lovink, G. (2025). Michael Heim’s Metaphysics of Virtual Reality, https://networkcultures.org/ge... January 14, 2025).
 
6.
Gurczyński, J. (2013). What is Virtuality: Matrix as a Model of Virtual Reality (in Polish). Wydawnictwo UMCS.
 
7.
Gorguette d’Argoeuves, T. (2010). Book Review: The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality – Michael Heim, ABAC Journal, 30, pp. 87-92.
 
8.
Heim, M. (1999). Electric Language: A Philosophical Study of Word Processing. Yale University Press.
 
9.
Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford University Press.
 
10.
Heim, M. (1995). The design of virtual reality. Body & Society, 1(3–4), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/135703....
 
11.
Heim, M. (1993a). The Essence of VR. Idealistic Studies, 23(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstud....
 
12.
Heim, M. (2000). Virtual Realism, Oxford University Press.
 
13.
Kluszczyński, R. W. (2001). Information Society: Cyberculture. Multimedia Art. In: Culture and Art at the Threshold of the 21st Century, pp. 96–98, Rabid.
 
14.
Krueger, M. (1991). Artificial Reality II. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
 
15.
Mazurek, M. (2020). O obiektach wirtualnych, Filozofia i Nauka. Studia Filozoficzne i Interdyscyplinarne, 8 (1), 137-154. doi: 10.37240/FiN.2020.8.1.5.
 
16.
Meidan, A. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Pragmatics and Cognition. 3, 385–386.
 
17.
Morse, M. (1999). Virtualities. Television, Media Art, and Cyberculture. Indiana University Press.
 
18.
Novak, R. (2017). Heim M, The metaphysics of virtual reality. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 304–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/204275....
 
19.
Osborne, T. M. (2011). Thomas Aquinas and John duns scotus on individual acts and the ultimate end. In Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages (pp. 351–374). BRILL.
 
20.
Ostrowicki, M. (2006). Virtual Realities: Aesthetics in the Age of Electronics (in Polish). Universitas.
 
21.
Pawłowski, A. (2013). Virtualization – History and an Attempt to Reconstruct the Concept. In L. W. Zacher (Ed.), Virtualization: Problems, Challenges, Consequences (in Polish). Poltext.
 
22.
Scotus, J. (1987). Duns Scotus: Philosophical Writings: A Selection. B. Allan (ed.). Hackett Publishing Co, Inc.
 
23.
Stanovsky, D. (2004). Aspects of Virtual Representation. Springer.
 
24.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence.
 
25.
The Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460....
 
26.
Wilson, P. (1994). The metaphysics of virtual reality (book review). College and Research Libraries, 55(1), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_55....
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top