ORIGINAL PAPER
Teachers co-organizing education in the opinions of subject teachers in the Polish education system
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of the National Education Commission, Krakow, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-03-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-11-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-17
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Izabella Anna Gałuszka   

University of the National Education Commission, Krakow, Poland
 
 
JoMS 2025;64(4):482-500
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The study is a presentation of the competence and cooperation of teachers co-organizing education in mainstream schools, presented through the prism of the narrative of subject teachers. In the topic literature, the issue of evaluation of cooperation with special educators, reviewed by teachers conducting subject education, is rarely discussed.

Material and methods:
The aim of the study is to learn about the subjective assessment of the competences of special educators and their cooperation with subject teachers. In order to achieve the aim of the research, the main research problem was formulated: How do subject teachers perceive and assess the competences and cooperation with teachers co-organizing the education process. The adopted research procedure uses a qualitative strategy, the method of individual cases, the structured interview technique and the teacher's interview questionnaire tool in our own study.

Results:
On the basis of the conducted research, it was found that the quality of work of a teacher co-organizing the education process of SEN pupils is determined not only by their knowledge and skills, i.e. professional competences, but also by personality competences.

Conclusions:
Teacher collaboration in the classroom is one of the main factors determining educational success. Teachers co-organizing the education process and subject teachers should therefore closely cooperate with each other, adopting single-track goals, tasks and strategies for working with SEN pupils, who should be the most important link in this cooperation.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Apanel, D. (2013). Supporting Teacher in Inclusive and Inclusive Education – Role, Tasks, Personality Dispositions, Volume 2, 398-414. Library of Contemporary Pedagogical Thought.
 
2.
Bartuś, E. (2023). Special educator as a co-organizer of inclusive education in teachers' narratives, no. 4(52)/2023, 209-229. Colloquium Pedagogy – Political Science and Administration Quarterly.
 
3.
Celuch, M., Czarnocka, M. (2024). A supporting teacher in a school, kindergarten, center. Wiedza i Praktyka Publishing House.
 
4.
Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., Frey, B. B. (2022). Professional development with universal design for learning: supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL, Professional Development in Education, 48:1, 22-37, DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563.
 
5.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (2001). Competence. in: M. Wójcicka (ed.) Quality of education in higher education. Thematic dictionary, 68-69. Centre for Research on Scientific Policy and Higher Education.
 
6.
del Palomino, C.P.M. (2018). Information and communication technologies and inclusive teaching: perceptions and attitudes of future early childhood and primary education teachers. Problems of education in the 21st century. 76(3). 380-392. DOI: 10.33225/pec/18.76.380.
 
7.
Fernández-Batanero J. M., Montenegro-Rueda M., Fernández-Cerero J. (2022). Are primary education teachers trained for the use of the technology with disabled pupils? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 17:19. DOI: 10.1186/s4103902200195x.
 
8.
Flick, U. (2012). Designing a qualitative study. PWN Scientific Publishers.
 
9.
Flood, M., Banks, J. (2021). Universal Design for Learning: Is It Gaining Momentum in Irish Education? Education Sciences 11, 7:341. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11070341.
 
10.
Gajdzica Z. (2011). Difficult situations in the opinion of teachers of integrated classes. Impuls Publishing House.
 
11.
Kauffman J. M., Hornby G. (2020). Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality. Education Sciences. 10(9), 1-13. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10090258.
 
12.
Kupisiewicz, M. (2013). Dictionary of Special Education. OWN.
 
13.
Kupisiewicz, M. (2016). Special educator – a person with exceptional personality predispositions, a professional with extensive, interdisciplinary knowledge and skills. Volume VII, No. 4(17), 173-186. From the theory of upbringing.
 
14.
Mein. (2023). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Science of 14 September 2023 on the detailed qualifications required of teachers. Journal of Law of 2023, item 2102. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
15.
MEN. (2017). Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 9 August 2017 on the conditions for the provision of education and care to children and young people with disabilities, socially maladjusted and at risk of social maladjustment. Journal of Law 2017, item 1578. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
16.
MEN. (2022). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Science of 22 July 2022 amending the Regulation on the rules for the organisation and provision of psychological and pedagogical support in public nursery schools, schools and other educational institutions. Journal of Law of 2022, item 1594. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
17.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education. (2019). Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 25 July 2019 on the standard of initial teacher training. Journal of Law 2024, item 453. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
18.
MRPiPS. (2018). Information about the profession. Special educator (235919). Access 1.09.2024 z https://psz.praca.gov.pl/rynek....
 
19.
Rispoli, M.; Neely, L.; Healy, O.; Gregori, E.(2016). Training Public School Special Educators to Implement Two Functional Analysis Models. Journal of Behavioral Education 25/3, 249-274. DOI:10.1007/s10864-016-9247-2.
 
20.
Rubacha K. (2008). Methodology of research on education. Academic and Literary Publishing House.
 
21.
Skura, M. (2018). Relations between the support teacher and the lead teacher – the topic is still open. No. 29/2018, 66-86. Disability. Discourses of Special Education.
 
22.
Soszyńska, K. (2021). The role and importance of the supporting teacher in the process of therapy of pupils with special educational needs. No. 21 (14), 39-65. Disabled pupil. Sketches and Dissertations.
 
23.
UNESCO (2005). Guidelines for Inclusion, Ensuring Access to Education for All. UNESCO Press. Access 1.09.2024 z https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark....
 
24.
Act of 14 December 2016, Law on School Education. Journal of Law 2024, item 737. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
25.
The School Education Act of 7 September 1991. Journal of Laws of 2004 No. 256 item 2572 as amended. Access 1.09.2024 from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.....
 
26.
Woodcock S., Anderson J. (2025). Conceptions to classrooms: The influence of teacher knowledge on inclusive classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research Open. Vol. 8, 100412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100412.
 
27.
Zacharuk, T. (2011). Inclusive education as an opportunity for all pupils. No. 1(20), 2-7. Meritum Mazovian Educational Quarterly.
 
28.
Zamkowska A. (2017). Cooperation of teachers in an inclusive class, vol. 6, 117-131. Library of Contemporary Pedagogical Thought.
 
29.
Zamkowska A., Nogaj P. (2024). Scope of Co-Teachers’ Tasks in Polish Elementary Schools. 39(1), 164-179. International Journal of Special Education. DOI: 10.52291/ijse.2024.39.15.
 
30.
Zaorska, M. (2022). Cooperation between teachers and specialist teachers in the context of the effectiveness of inclusive education for pupils with special educational needs. No. 5, 66-76. Care and educational problems.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top