Sustainability communication on Twitter: disability disclosures of listed companies in Poland
University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Strategic Development
University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Statistics
Data nadesłania: 05-04-2023
Data akceptacji: 28-11-2023
Data publikacji: 30-12-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Joanna Próchniak   

University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Strategic Development
JoMS 2023;53(4):419-436
A rapidly growing corporate use of social media can support corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability advocacy of listed companies enhancing the positive image of people with disabilities and social inclusion. Emphasizing CSR towards people with disability (D), abbreviated CSR+D or CSR-D, is customary. The aim of the study is to examine the use of Twitter to highlight advocacy efforts for people with disabilities by the sixty best sustainability-oriented WSE listed companies in Poland.

Material and methods:
We examined keywords and their popularity and context using topic modeling and text mining based on corporate tweets. Tweets’ topics were extracted using the DMM model from 154,496 company media uploads. Then, the occurring themes were determined.

The results indicate a very limited promotion of CSR activities on Twitter. Accordingly, also limited use of Twitter in communicating disability with no diffusion of topics was observed, despite an overall increase of corporate social media use. Disability issues were are far more often communicated for high-profile events related to disability. Only a few tweets appeared on Down syndrome, with more frequent tweets referring to visual, hearing, or autism disorders. However, tweets about disability receive more users’ reactions and gain a wider audience than example those related to seniors or climate. More results on topics and their popularity due to the sector, time and accompanying events were included.

The research contribute to understanding of the evolving social media tools and their corporate whereas there is limited or paid access to data.

Abitbol, A. & Lee, S. Y. (2017). Messages on CSR-dedicated Facebook pages: What works and what doesn’t, 43 (4), 796-808, Public Relations Review.
Ajayi, O. A. & Mmutle, T. (2021). Corporate reputation through strategic communication of corporate social responsibility, 26 (5), 1-15, Corporate Communications: An International Journal.
Ali, I., Jiménez-Zarco, A. I. & Bicho, M. (2015). Using social media for CSR communication and engaging stakeholders. In: Corporate social responsibility in the digital age, 165-185, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Anderson, S. (2022). Threats to valuing diverse voices in public debates about disability. A case study from social media,1-13, Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Ang M. C. H. (2017). The Challenges and Benefits of Employing Persons with Disabilities: The Japanese Multinational Corporations’ Perspective, 8(5) 359-366, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology.
Balasubramanian, S. K., Fang, Y. & Yang, Z. (2021). Twitter Presence and Experience Improve Corporate Social Responsibility Outcomes, 173(4), 737-757, Journal of Business Ethics.
Bartram, T., Cavanagh, J., Meacham, H., & Pariona-Cabrera, P. (2021). Re-calibrating HRM to improve the work experiences for workers with intellectual disability, 59, 63–83, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources.
Bialkova, S. & Te Paske, S. (2021). Campaign participation, spreading electronic word of mouth, purchase: how to optimise corporate social responsibility, CSR, effectiveness via social media?, 30 (1), 108-126, European Journal of Management and Business Economics.
Bitman, N. (2021). ‘Which part of my group do I represent?’: disability activism and social media users with concealable communicative disabilities. Information, Communication & Society.
Blei, D. M. & Lafferty. J. D. (2006). Dynamic Topic Models. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, June 2006,113-120, Pittsburgh.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation David, 3, 993–1022, Journal of Machine Learning Research.
Bredgaarda, T. & Salado-Rasmussen, J. (2021). Attitudes and behaviour of employers to recruiting persons with disabilities, 15 (1): 61-70, Alter – European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap.
Burnap, P. & Williams, M. L. (2016). Us and them: identifying cyber hate on Twitter across multiple protected characteristics, 5, 1-15, EPJ Data science.
Castelló, I., Etter, M. & Nielsen, F. Å. (2016). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy, 53 (3), 402-432, Journal of Management Studies.
Chae, B., & Park, E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): A survey of topics and trends using Twitter data and topic modelling, 10 (7), 2231, Sustainability.
Deng, X. & Cheng, X. (2019). Can ESG Indices Improve the Enterprises’ Stock Market Performance? —An Empirical Study from China, 11 (17): 4765, Sustainability.
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. L 330/1. Available at:
Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Deerwester, S. & Harshman, R. (1988). Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Improve Access to Textual Information, 15-19 May 1988, 281-285, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Washington D.C. USA, United States: Association for Computing Machinery.
Ebuenyi, I. D., van der Ham, A.J., Bunders-Aelen, J.F.G. & Regeer, B.J. (2020). Expectations management: employer perspectives on opportunities for improved employment of persons with mental disabilities in Kenya, 42 (12), 1687–1696, Disability and Rehabilitation.
Ellinger, A. E., Naidoo, J., Ellinger, A. D., Filips, K. & Herrin, G. D. (2020). Applying blue ocean strategy to hire and assimilate workers with disabilities into distribution centers, 63 (3), 339-350, Business Horizons.
Ellis, K., Kent, M., Locke, K. & Clocherty, C. (2017). Access for everyone? Australia’s ‘streaming wars’ and consumers with disabilities, 31 (6), 881–891, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies.
Filho, W. L., Manolas, E., Azul, A. M., Azeiteiro, U. M. & McGhie, H. (2018). Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 1 Theory of Climate Change Communication, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
Forum Darczyńców, Orange Fundacja and Fundacja Kronenberga City Handlowy (2017), Fundacje korporacyjne w Polsce, Report, Forum Darczyńców.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.
Furr, J. B., Carreiro, A. & McArthur, J. A. (2016). Strategic approaches to disability disclosure on social media, 31 (10), 1353-1368, Disability & Society.
Gould, R., Mullin, C., Parker, Harris S. & Jones, R. (2021). Building, sustaining and growing: disability inclusion in business, 41 (3), 418-434, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.
GRI (2022). Global Reporting Initiative Consolidated Set of GRI Standards. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.or....
Hemsley, B., Dann. S., Palmer, S., Allan, M. & Balandin S (2015). We definitely need an audience: experiences of Twitter, Twitter networks and tweet content in adults with severe communication disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), 37 (17), 1531-1542, Disability and Rehabilitation.
Hernández González, C. A. (2021). Market reactions to the inclusion of people with disabilities. Equality, 41 (3), 404-417, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal.
Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis. In: SIGIR ’99: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 15-19 August 1999, 50–57, Berkeley California USA, New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Houston, E. (2019). ‘Risky’ representation: the portrayal of women with mobility impairment in twenty-first-century advertising, 34 (5), 704-725.
Ineland, J., Gelfgren, S. & Cocq, C. (2019). Negotiating Authority: Disability, Interactions and Power Relations on Twitter, 21 (1), 238–249, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research.
Knight, M. (2018). Accessibility and Disability: Absent Keywords in Business and Professional Communication, 81 (1), 20–33, Business and Professional Communication Quarterly.
Kuo, P.J. & Kalargyrou, V. (2014). Consumers’ perspectives on service staff with disabilities in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26 (2), 164-182, Business and Professional Communication Quarterly.
Kwan, C. K. (2020). Socially responsible human resource practices to improve the employability of people with disabilities, 27 (1), 1–8, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. (1999). Learning the Parts of Objects by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization, 401 (6755), 788–91, Nature.
Lee, S., Rojas, H. & Yamamoto, M. (2022). Social media, messaging apps, and affective polarization in the United States and Japan, 25 (5), 673-697, Mass Communication and Society.
Leoński, W. (2017). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w obszarze niepełnosprawności (CSR+D), 100 (1972), 253-262, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej – Organizacja i Zarządzanie.
Lindsay, S., Cagliostro, E., Albarico, M., Mortaji, N. & Karon, L. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities, 28 (4), 634–655, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.
Maciaszczyk, M. (2015). Wirtualizacja procesu zakupowego konsumentów niepełnosprawnych ruchowo – wymóg czy wybór, 6 (359), 90-99, Handel Wewnętrzny.
Martin, B. C. & Honig, B. (2020). Inclusive Management Research: Persons with Disabilities and Self-Employment Activity as an Exemplar, 166 (3), 553–575, Journal of Business Ethics.
Mazurowska, M. & Płoska, R. (2022). Sprawozdawcza i pozasprawozdawcza komunikacja w zakresie społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Sopot: Centrum Myśli Strategicznych.
Migliaccio, G. (2019). Disabled People in the Stakeholder Theory: a Literature Analysis, 10 (4), 1657–1678, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
Moyaert, H., Vangehuchten, L. & Vallejo, A. M. F. (2021). The CSR Communication Strategy of IBERDROLA on Facebook and Twitter: a corpus-based linguistic and content analysis, 54, 119-142, Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI.
Özbilgin, M. & Tatli, A. (2021). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism, 64 (9), 1229–1253, Human Relations.
Pérez-Conesa, F. J., Romeo, M. & Yepes-Baldó, M. (2020). Labour inclusion of people with disabilities in Spain: the effect of policies and human resource management systems, 31 (6), 785-804, The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
Płoska, R. & Próchniak, J. (2020). Granice społecznego charakteru i jego pomiar w działalności przedsiębiorstw. In: Szymańska-Brałkowska, M., Wiśniewska, M. Z. & Antonowicz, P. (eds) Zarządzanie rozwojem przedsiębiorstwa: perspektywa nauki i praktyki gospodarczej, 163-181, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Röder, M., Both, A. & Hinneburg, A. (2015). Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures, In: WSDM 2015 – Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2-6 February 2015, 399–408, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Shanghai China.
Santoso, A. D. (2019). Social media campaigns on disability awareness: A content analysis of official government Twitter accounts, 22 (1), 95-112, Life Span and Disability.
Sarkar, T., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Hanebutt, R. & Cohen, M. (2021). Good morning, Twitter! What are you doing today to support the voice of people with #disability?: disability and digital organizing, 29 (3), 299-318, Journal of Community Practice.
Saxton, G. D., Gomez, L., Ngoh, Z., Lin, Y-P. & Dietrich, S. (2017). Do CSR messages resonate? Examining public reactions to firms’ CSR efforts on Social Media, 155 (2), 359-377, Journal of Business Ethics.
Schur, L., Han, K., Kim, A., Ameri, M., Blanck, P. & Kruse, D. (2017). Disability at Work: A Look Back and Forward, 27 (4), 482–497, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.
Segovia-San-Juan, A. I., Saavedra, I., & Fernández-de-Tejada V (2017). Analyzing Disability in Socially Responsible Companies, 130 (2/10), 617-645, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
She, C. & Michelon, G. (2019). Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook, 61, 54-76, Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
Shmatov, C. & Castelli, C. R. (2023). Quantitative methods for ESG finance. Wiley.
Tor-Carroggio, I. (2021). The customer is always right: Study on Chinese persons with sight loss’ opinion on audio description, 36 (2), 306-325, Disability & Society.
United Nations Human Rights Office of The High Commissioner (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Report. New York and Geneva.
Woodhams, C. & Danieli, A. (2000). Disability and diversity – a difference too far?, 29 (3), 402-416, Personnel Review.
Yin, J. & Wang, J. (2014). A Dirichlet Multinomial Mixture Model-Based Approach for Short Text Clustering. In: KDD ‹14: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 24-17 August 2014, 233-42, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, New York USA.
Zerbini, F. (2015). CSR Initiatives as Market Signals: A Review and Research Agenda, 146 (1), 1–23, Journal of Business Ethics.
Zientara, P., Zamojska, A. & Nikodemska-Wołowik, A.M. (2018). CSR, Age management and Altruism: The Role of Future Time Perspective and Personal Altruistic Convictions, 19 (11/II), 439-454, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top