Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to answer the question of whether Polish regulations regarding administrative mediation contribute to its frequent use at the explanatory and judicial stages of proceedings. The article also sought to answer the question of whether an out-of-court settlement is a desirable method for resolving administrative cases. This study also aims to answer the question of whether mediation increases a party's influence on shaping the outcome of cases not referred to mediation, and whether the risk of sanctions and enforcement is reduced in cases subject to mediation compared to cases not referred to mediation.

Material and methods:
The article employs the dogmatic-legal (formal-doctrinal) method alongside the analytical-synthetic method. An in-depth analysis of the relevant literature and case law was conducted. The research methodology applied allows for the presentation of various scholarly perspectives and outlines the legal framework governing mediation, while also assessing its alignment with the legislator's objectives.

Results:
It was pointed out, above all, that mediation can provide more flexibility in determining the implementation of decisions, thus avoiding sanctions and enforcement for the party, while for the authority it enables effective enforcement of decisions, reducing the administrative burden, and improving the quality and acceptance of administrative decisions. It was emphasized that mediation takes into account the needs and interests of the party and the authority, while also building public trust in the administration.

Conclusions:
Mediation for both participants in the process shortens the duration of the proceedings, reduces costs, increases the effectiveness of enforcing decisions, takes place in an atmosphere of confidentiality and builds trust in the administration.