ORIGINAL PAPER
The Business Judgment Rule in Delaware law is a determinant of national security for the United States
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Pomeranian University in Słupsk
 
 
Submission date: 2025-09-15
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-08
 
 
Publication date: 2026-04-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Robert Lizak   

Pomeranian University in Słupsk
 
 
JoMS 2026;65(1):653-667
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The essence of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in Delaware law goes beyond protecting managers and influences the innovative dynamics of the American economy, and is also a crucial element of the United States' national security architecture because it enables radically risky business decisions.

Material and methods:
This article uses a dogmatic legal approach to explain the essence of the BJR within the context of Delaware law and case law, and a comparative approach to compare the BJR with federal law. The analysis encompasses scholarly literature in law, economics, management, and political science, as well as US documents related to innovation, artificial intelligence, and national security.

Results:
The BJR protects managerial discretion, which increases risk acceptance and promotes the implementation of long-term strategies and short-term profit maximization. This principle has contributed to Delaware becoming a corporate center for the United States, enabling the private sector to pursue groundbreaking projects, such as those in the field of artificial intelligence. The study also demonstrates that the BJR fosters a complementary relationship between innovation and national security, as dual-use technologies strengthen both the US economy and military capabilities.

Conclusions:
A review of federal strategies and adopted legislation from 2018–2023 indicates that the US government bases its policies on cooperation between the public and private sectors, with the BJR acting as a safeguard for private innovators. Consequently, it is reasonable to argue that the BJR is not only a corporate law norm but also a determinant of maintaining the United States' global technological and strategic advantage.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Bainbridge, S.M. (2019). The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine. Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, s. 83–130.
 
2.
Black, L.S., Jr. (2007). Why Corporations Choose Delaware, s. 1–10. Delaware: Department of State, Division of Corporations, https://corpfiles.delaware.gov... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
3.
Branscomb, L.M., Auerswald, P.E. (2003). Taking technical risks: how innovators, executives, and investors manage high-tech risks, s. 33. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
 
4.
Bullock, J.W. (2023). Delaware Division of Corporations: 2023 Annual Report, s. 1–3. Dover (Delaware): U.S. Secretary of State.
 
5.
Carney, W.J., Shepherd, G.B., Shepherd, J.M. (2012). Lawyers, Ignorance, and the Dominance of Delaware Corporate Law. Harvard Business Law Review, Volume 2, s. 123–151.
 
6.
Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, s. 69–89. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
 
7.
Cunningham, L. (2024). Delaware Corporate Law Debate Feeds a Robust and Balanced System. Bloomberg Law, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
8.
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., León, L.R., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (red.) (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024. Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship, 17th Edition. World Intellectual Property Organization, s.243. Geneva, Switzerland.
 
9.
Eisenhower, D.D. (1954). Special Message to the Congress on Foreign Economic Policy, Online by G. Peters, In Woolley J.T., The American Presidency Project, https://www.presidency.ucsb.ed... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
10.
Feldman, N., Kawano, L., Patel, E., Rao, N., Stevens, M., Edgerton, J. (2018). The Long and Short of It: Do Public and Private Firms Invest Differently? Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, s. 1–48. Washington, D.C.: Federal Reserve Board.
 
11.
Fisch, J.E. (2000). The Peculiar Role of the Delaware Courts in the Competition for Corporate Charters University of Pennsylvania. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 68, s. 1061–1100.
 
12.
Guan, Y., Zhang, L., Zheng, L., Zou, H. (2021). Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, s. 1–23.
 
13.
Lizak R. (2024). Prawne aspekty neuronowego modelu zarządzania danymi w administracji federalnej Stanów Zjednoczonych z wykorzystaniem AI, s. 37–40. Monografie Prawnicze. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
 
14.
Lizak R. (2025), Business Judgement Rule in Delaware corporation law and Polish company law – a comparative study, Journal of Polish-Georgian Law, nr 5, s. 94–111.
 
15.
Lizak, R., Skuza, S. (2025). Protecting risk management strategies for foreign investment in the United States from a national security perspective. Central European Management Journal, 4(33), s. 618–663.
 
16.
O’Reilly, C.A. III, Tushman, M.L., (2016). Lead and Disrupt, How to Solve the Innovator’s Dilemma. s. 11-14. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
 
17.
Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, s. 73–91. Brighton, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review.
 
18.
Poterba, J.M., Summers, L.H. (1995). A CEO Survey of U.S. Companies’ Time Horizons and Hurdle Rates. Sloan Management Review, 37(1), https://sloanreview.mit.edu/ar... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
19.
Quist, A.S. (1993). Chapter 5. Information-Disclosure Risks and Benefits, In Security Classification of Information. M. Marietta (red.)., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: U.S. Department of Energy, https://sgp.fas.org/library/qu... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
20.
Reese, S. (2013). Defining Homeland Security: Analysis and Congressional Considerations. Analyst in Emergency Management and Homeland Security Policy, Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, https://www.congress.gov/crs-p... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
21.
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., Martin, B.R. (2015). What is an emerging technology?. Research Policy, 44(10), s. 1827–1843.
 
22.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, s. 81–87. New York and London: Harper Brothers Publishers.
 
23.
Sharfman, B.S. (2017). The Importance of the Business Judgment Rule. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 14(1), s. 27–69.
 
24.
Taylor, M. (1974). The Legitimate Claims of National Security. Foreign Affairs, 52, s. 577–594.
 
25.
Veasey, E.N. (1998). An Economic Rationale for Judicial Decisionmaking in Corporate Law. Business Lawyer, 53(3), s. 681–700.
 
26.
Vera, R.L. de la, Ramge, T. (2024). By napędzać radykalne innowacje, VC musi powrócić do korzeni. MIT Sloan, Management Review Polska, https://mitsmr.pl/transformacj... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
27.
Weinberg, J.D. (2015). Delaware Court Strengthens Protections for Independent Directors. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, https://corpgov.law.harvard.ed... (dostęp: 10.02.2026).
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top