ORIGINAL PAPER
Motivations for pursuing education among students of Penitentiary Studies at the Academy of Justice
 
More details
Hide details
1
The Academy of Justice
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-10
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-02-08
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-02-10
 
 
Publication date: 2026-04-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Zbigniew Nowacki   

The Academy of Justice
 
 
JoMS 2026;65(1):668-684
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The purpose of this article is to identify factors associated with learning in the Penitentiary Studies within full-time Bachelor's and Master's programmes for Prison Service officers in candidate service at the Academy of Justice. The study aims to examine the relationships between variables distinguished through factor analysis.

Material and methods:
The research was conducted using the diagnostic survey method and statistical–comparative analyses. In line with the adopted methodological framework, the questionnaire technique was applied. The research instrument consisted of a questionnaire designed by the author.

Results:
The analysis identified four principal factors associated with learning. The first factor, termed "Orientation toward Personal Development", accounts for 14.06% of the total variance. The second factor, labelled "Striving for Personal Success", explains 5.98% of the variance. The third factor, defined as "Maximization of Self-Interest", accounts for 4.85% of the variance. The fourth factor, referred to as "Individual Activity", explains 4.74% of the variance. The results indicate a weak correlation between the factors "Orientation toward Personal Development" and "Striving for Personal Success." A similarly weak correlation was observed between "Orientation toward Personal Development" and "Maximization of Self-Interest".

Conclusions:
Although a substantial proportion of variance (nearly 18.8%) is explained by factors reflecting intrinsic motivation for learning, this finding should be interpreted with caution. Intrinsic motivation alone may not provide a sufficiently reliable foundation for formal education, particularly with regard to the implementation of structured curricula. Learners motivated by internal factors may tend to neglect certain institutional or curricular obligations.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What Teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91, s. 409–421.
 
2.
Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, Learning, and Action, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
3.
Boyd, R.D., Apps, J.W. i in. (1980). Redefining the discipline of adult education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
4.
Brophy, J. (2002). Motywowanie uczniów do nauki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
5.
Chrupała-Pniak, M., Grabowski, D. (2016). Skala motywacji zewnętrznej i wewnętrznej do pracy (WEIMS-PL): Wstępna charakterystyka psychometryczna polskiej wersji kwestionariusza Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale. Psychologia Społeczna, 3, s. 339–355.
 
6.
Clark, C.S., Dobbins, G.H., Ladd, R.T. (1993). Exploratory field study of training motivation: Infiluence of involvement. Group and Organization Management, 18, s. 292–307.
 
7.
Ferguson G.A., Takane Y. (2002). Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
8.
Hicks, W.D., Klimoski, R.J. (1987). Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 30, s. 542–552.
 
9.
Kałużny, R. (2013). Kształcenie dorosłych w dobie płynnej ponowoczesności. Edukacja Dorosłych, 1, s. 45–53.
 
10.
Knowles, M.S., Holton III, E.F., Swanson, R.A. (2009). Edukacja dorosłych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
11.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–All.
 
12.
Kozłowski, W. (2010). Zarządzanie motywacją pracowników. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CeDeWu Sp. z o.o.
 
13.
Nawrat, D. (2013). Jak uczą się dorośli? Wybrane uwarunkowania uczenia się dorosłych. Edukacja Dorosłych , 1(68), s. 67–79.
 
14.
Nisan, M. (1992). Beyond intrinsic motivation: Cultivating a sense of the desirable”. W: Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis. F. Oser, A. Dick, J. Patry (red.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
15.
Nowacki, Z. (2025). Motywy podejmowania nauki na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe w Uniwersytecie Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach. Journal of Modern Science, 63(3).
 
16.
Pratt, D.D. (1988). Andragogy as a relational construct. Adult Edication Quarterly, 38, s. 160–181.
 
17.
Raffini, J. (1988). Student Apathy: The protection of self-worth. Washington: NEA.
 
18.
Ryan, R., Connell, J., Grolnick, W. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated: A theory of internalization and self-regulation in school. W: A. Boggiano, T. Pittman (red.). Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
19.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
20.
Tannenbaum, S.I., Mathieu, J.E., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self–efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, s. 739–769.
 
21.
Vroom, V.H. (1995). Work and Motivation (classic reprint). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
22.
Wlodowski, R.J. (1985). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn, Revised Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
23.
Zimbardo, P.G., Johnson, R.L., McCann, V. (2010). Psychologia. Kluczowe koncepcje. Motywacja i uczenie się. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top