ORIGINAL PAPER
The Mobilization Capacity of the State in the Context of Demographic Crisis
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Pomeranian University in Słupsk
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
			
			 
			Submission date: 2025-03-30
			 
		 		
		
			
			 
			Final revision date: 2025-10-13
			 
		 		
		
		
			
			 
			Acceptance date: 2025-10-14
			 
		 		
		
		
			
			 
			Publication date: 2025-10-31
			 
		 			
		 
	
					
		
	 
		
 
 
JoMS 2025;63(3):121-145
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to determine the impact of contemporary demographic processes—particularly low fertility rates, rapid population ageing, and deteriorating health conditions—on the long-term mobilization potential of the state. The author hypothesizes that demographic factors may significantly limit the state’s ability to conduct effective national defense and respond to crises over the coming decades.
Material and methods:
The study adopts an integrated methodological approach, combining theoretical methods (analysis, synthesis, abstraction) with prognostic methods based on quantitative data. Within the framework of prognostic analysis, the scenario technique was applied, enabling the development of alternative future pathways based on logical assumptions about key demographic variables. Three scenarios were developed—optimistic, moderate, and pessimistic—taking into account variations in fertility rates (TFR), population health status, and the pace of societal ageing.
Results:
Forecasts indicate that under the pessimistic scenario, the state's mobilization potential could decline by as much as 75% over the next four decades, substantially weakening its capacity for crisis response and national defense.
Conclusions:
The findings underscore the necessity of systematically incorporating demographic analysis into strategic planning and of formulating public policies aimed at mitigating the decline of human resources essential for national security. The article fills a research gap in the quantitative assessment of demographic trends affecting state mobilization capabilities.
		
	
		
REFERENCES (31)
			
	1.
	
		Apanowicz, J. (2002). Metodologia ogólna. Gdynia: Wyższa Szkoła Administracji i Biznesu.
		
	 
	 
 			
	2.
	
		Babbie, E. (2008). Podstawy badań społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
		
	 
	 
 			
	3.
	
		Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
		
	 
	 
 			
	4.
	
		Coleman, D., Rowthorn, R. (2011). Who’s Afraid of Population Decline? A Critical Examination of Its Consequences. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 217–248, 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728....
 
	 
 			
	5.
	
		Collins, A. (red.). (2013). Contemporary Security Studies (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	6.
	
		Dandeker, C. (2006). Recruitment and Retention in the Armed Forces: A Contemporary Challenge. Armed Forces & Society, 32(2), 166–187, 
https://doi.org/10.1177/009532....
 
	 
 			
	7.
	
		Defence24. (2023, 28 marca). Wpływ przemian demograficznych na siły zbrojne RP, 
https://defence24.pl.
 
	 
 			
	8.
	
		Eberstadt, N. (2012). A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
			
	10.
	
		Gierszewski, J., Pieczywok, A. (2020). Metodologiczne podstawy badania problemów bezpieczeństwa. Warszawa: Difin.
		
	 
	 
 			
	11.
	
		Godet, M. (2001). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. London: Economica.
		
	 
	 
 			
	12.
	
		Goldstone, J.A. (2012). A Theory of Political Demography: Human and Institutional Reproduction. W: J. Goldstone, E. Kaufmann, M.D. Toft (red.). Political Demography: How Population Changes Are Reshaping International Security and National Politics (s. 10–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	13.
	
		Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022). Prognoza ludności na lata 2023–2060. Warszawa: GUS.
		
	 
	 
 			
	14.
	
		Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2023). Rocznik Demograficzny 2023. Warszawa: GUS.
		
	 
	 
 			
	15.
	
		Gray, C.S. (1999). Modern Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	16.
	
		Gryz, J. (2010). Współczesne znaczenie siły militarnej w polityce międzynarodowej. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego – 2009/2010, 23–34. Warszawa: Akademia Obrony Narodowej.
		
	 
	 
 			
	17.
	
		Jackson, R., Howe, N. (2012). Demography and Geopolitics: Understanding Today’s Debate in Its Historical and Intellectual Context. W: J. Goldstone, E. Kaufmann, M.D. Toft (red.). Political Demography: How Population Changes Are Reshaping International Security and National Politics (s. 31–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	18.
	
		Jankowski, J., Wojnarowski, J. (2012). Planowanie mobilizacyjnego rozwinięcia jednostki wojskowej. Warszawa: Akademia Obrony Narodowej.
		
	 
	 
 			
	19.
	
		Jasiński, M. (2015). Metoda identyfikacji podejść do strategii. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, 1(22), 9–21.
		
	 
	 
 			
	20.
	
		Jensen, B., Montgomery, M. (2024, December 12). The demographic dilemma: Why military support must consider population trends. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Series: Strategic Headwinds: Understanding the Forces Shaping Ukraine’s Path to Peace, 
https://www.csis.org/analysis/....
 
	 
 			
			
	22.
	
		Libicki, M.C., Shatz, H.J., Taylor, J.E. (2011). Global Demographic Change and Its Implications for Military Power. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
		
	 
	 
 			
	23.
	
		Ministerstwo Obrony Narodowej. (2025, 15 stycznia). Dane dotyczące liczebności Sił Zbrojnych RP według stanu na 31 grudnia 2024 r. [komunikat prasowy]. Warszawa: MON. 
https://www.gov.pl/web/obrona-...-.
 
	 
 			
	24.
	
		Morgenthau, H.J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
		
	 
	 
 			
			
	26.
	
		Szymański, M. (2001). Wprowadzenie do metod badań pedagogicznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
		
	 
	 
 			
	27.
	
		Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
		
	 
	 
 			
	28.
	
		Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S00208....
 
	 
 			
	29.
	
		Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and Desecuritization. W: R.D. Lipschutz (red.), On Security (s. 46–86). New York: Columbia University Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	30.
	
		Wojnarowski, J. (2008). Mobilizacja sił zbrojnych szansą utrzymania bezpieczeństwa Polski. Warszawa: Akademia Obrony Narodowej.
		
	 
	 
 			
	31.
	
		Zieliński, J. (2012). Metodologia pracy naukowej. Warszawa: Aspra.