ORIGINAL PAPER
Social proof as an element of User Experience
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-09-09
Acceptance date: 2026-02-02
Publication date: 2026-04-18
JoMS 2026;65(1):257-275
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of this paper is to analyze the phenomenon of social proof and to assess its significance in the design of user experiences for digital products.
Material and methods:
A review of the literature and case studies on the implementation of social proof in online environments was conducted. The analysis considered the psychological foundations of the mechanism, including informational and normative conformity, as well as its diverse forms, such as reviews, ratings, recommendations, case studies, popularity metrics, and community activity.
Results:
The study found that social proof plays a crucial role in building trust and increasing conversion in User Experience design. The effectiveness of this mechanism depends on its authenticity, transparency, and suitability to the nature of the product and the user profile. Potential risks of unethical use were also identified, including fake reviews, manipulative design patterns (dark patterns), and astroturfing.
Conclusions:
Social proof is an important and effective element of user experience design; however, its efficiency requires responsible application. Ethical implementation, based on authenticity and transparency, is essential to avoid the loss of user trust.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Alabri, A. (2022). Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): The Effects of the Need to Belong, Perceived Centrality, and Fear of Social Exclusion. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4....
2.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., Akert, R.M. (1997). Psychologia społeczna. Serce i umysł. Poznań; Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
4.
Chong, W.K., Ma, Z. (2021). The quality of user experiences for mobile recommendation systems: An end-user perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(5), s. 1063–1081,
https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-0....
5.
Cialdini, R.B. (2023). Wywieranie wpływu na ludzi. Psychologia perswazji. Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
6.
Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), s. 591–621,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
7.
Doliński, D. (2000). Psychologia wpływu społecznego. Wrocław: Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Ossolineum.
8.
Hamer, H. (2005). Psychologia społeczna. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Difin.
9.
Jiao, R.J., Zhou, F., Chu, C.-H. (2017). Decision theoretic modeling of affective and cognitive needs for product experience engineering. Key issues and a conceptual framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(7), s. 1755–1767,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845....
10.
Klimek, J. (2014). Etyka biznesu. Teoretyczne założenia, praktyka zastosowań. Warszawa: Difin.
11.
Koh, T.K., Fichman, M. (2012). Courting Two-Timers: Multi-Homing Users’ Preferences for Two-Sided Exchange Networks. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2012(1), 12156,
https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.....
12.
Kosznik-Biernacka, S. (2017). Techniki manipulacji informacją w nowych mediach. Zagrożenia indywidualne i społeczne. W: K. Materska, B. Taraszkiewicz (red.), Ekologia informacji a zasoby informacyjne w bibliotekach i cyberprzestrzeni, (s. 212–224). Słupsk: Biblioteka Uczelniana Akademii Pomorskiej. Pedagogiczna Biblioteka Wojewódzka. Stowarzyszenie Bibliotekarzy Polskich. Zarząd Oddziału.
13.
Lindley, S.E., Monk, A.F. (2008). Social enjoyment with electronic photograph displays: Awareness and control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(8), s. 587–604,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhc....
14.
Luther, L., Tiberius, V., Brem, A. (2020). User Experience (UX) in Business, Management, and Psychology. A Bibliometric Mapping of the Current State of Research. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), s. 18,
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti402....
15.
Meshi, D., Biele, G., Korn, C.W., Heekeren, H.R. (2012). How Expert Advice Influences Decision Making, 7(11), e49748. PLoS ONE,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
16.
Park, U. (2023). Introduction to design thinking for UX beginners. B.m.: B.w.
17.
Pavlović-Höck, D.N. (2022). Herd behaviour along the consumer buying decision process – Experimental study in the mobile communications industry, 2(1), 100018. Digital Business,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digb....
19.
Rastogi, S. (2024). Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchase Decision. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 08(04), s. 1–5,
https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsre....
20.
Sparks, B.A., Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), s. 1310–1323,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tour....
21.
Tomaszczyk, J., Matysek, A. (2020). IA, UX, UID, IxD – analiza terminów i pojęć. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej – Studia Informacyjne, 58(1), s. 121–143,
https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.6....
22.
Tuziak, B. (2010). Autorytet jako zjawisko społeczne. Wymiar lokalny. Studia Socjologiczne, 2(197), s. 53–88.
24.
Yan, Z., Zhang, P., Deng, R.H. (2012). TruBeRepec:A trust-behavior-based reputation and recommender system for mobile applications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(5), s. 485–506,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779....
25.
Zhu, L., Li, H., Wang, F.-K., He, W., Tian, Z. (2020). How online reviews affect purchase intention: A new model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), s. 463–488,
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-1....
26.
Zimbardo, P.G., Leippe, M.R. (2004). Psychologia zmiany postaw i wpływu społecznego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.