Integrated approach to education management: Innovative strategies and methods in combining pedagogy and management in a modern school
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Academy of War Arts in Warsaw
 
2
Alcide De Gasperi University of Euroregional Economy in Józefów, Poland
 
3
University of Szczecin
 
4
SGH Warsaw School of Economics
 
 
Data nadesłania: 02-09-2023
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 05-12-2023
 
 
Data akceptacji: 09-12-2023
 
 
Data publikacji: 30-12-2023
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Grzegorz Paweł Świecarz   

College of Euroregional Economy Alcide De Gasperi in Józefów
 
 
JoMS 2023;53(4):592-621
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
A scientific article entitled 'Integrated Approach to Education Management: Innovative Strategies and Methods in Combining Pedagogy and Management' discusses the complexity of educational management in the context of contemporary challenges. The authors examine how innovation can affect the effectiveness and efficiency of education systems. They pay attention to key aspects such as system adaptability, cultural diversity and technological support in teaching.

Material and methods:
A variety of research methods were used in the article, including literature analysis, qualitative and quantitative analysis, and case studies. The data set comes from a variety of sources, including official databases, a survey of teachers and students, and direct observation. The research methodology has been designed in such a way as to take into account both quantitative and qualitative aspects, which enables a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of education management.

Results:
The results of the study indicate several key aspects of education management that have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the system. It has been identified that innovation in management is strongly associated with positive educational outcomes. It has also been noted that education systems that are more open to innovation have higher student performance and outcomes.

Conclusions:
The article ends with a synthesis of the results and recommendations for practice and further research. It was emphasized that education management is a complex process that requires an integrated approach and taking into account many variables. It was also emphasized that innovation and effective management are key elements in achieving success in education.

 
REFERENCJE (33)
1.
Ahn, R., Catbagan, P., Tamayo, K., I, J. Y., Lopez, M., & Walker, P. (2015). Successful minority pedagogy in mathematics: US and Japanese case studies. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 87-102.
 
2.
Alam, A. (2020). Pedagogy of calculus in India: an empirical investigation. Alam, A.(2020). Pedagogy of Calculus in India: An Emperical Investigation. Periódico Tchê Química, 17(34), 164-180.
 
3.
Alam, A. (2021, November). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
 
4.
Alisov, E. A., Podymov, N. A., Postavnev, V. M., Postavneva, I. V., & Ospanova, Y. N. (2020). Comparative pedagogical analysis of teacher education programs in France and the USA. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 79, p. 02001). EDP Sciences.
 
5.
Clark, A. (2006). Teaching the nation: politics and pedagogy in Australian history. History Teacher, 44(1), 16-18.
 
6.
De Araujo, A. M. P., & Slomski, V. G. (2013). Active learning methods—an analysis of applications and experiences in Brazilian accounting teaching. Creative Education, 4(12), 20.
 
7.
Deák, C., Kumar, B., Szabó, I., Nagy, G., & Szentesi, S. (2021). Evolution of new approaches in pedagogy and STEM with inquiry-based learning and post-pandemic scenarios. Education Sciences, 11(7), 319.
 
8.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.
 
9.
Golovina, Y. Y., & Grankin, Y. Y. (2022). On the Need and Opportunities for Digitalization of the Educational and Methodological Support of the Educational Process in the Context of Improving Its Quality Indicators. In Big Data in the GovTech System (pp. 3-12). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
 
10.
Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., & Nihill, C. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities.
 
11.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483.
 
12.
Jakowicka E, Pedagogical University, Poland. In PUB DATE 92 NOTE 1,358 p. PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF11/PC55 Plu: Postage. (p. 360).
 
13.
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., & Wiśniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 57-61.
 
14.
Khan, M. A., & Law, L. S. (2015). An Integrative Approach to Curriculum Development in Higher Education in the USA: A Theoretical Framework. International Education Studies, 8(3), 66-76.
 
15.
Knauf, H. (2020). Documentation strategies: Pedagogical documentation from the perspective of early childhood teachers in New Zealand and Germany. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1), 11-19.
 
16.
Kolâs, L., Nordseth, H., & Munkvold, R. (2016, September). Learning with educational apps: A qualitative study of the most popular free apps in Norway. In 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
 
17.
Leme, M. C., Louzano, P., Ponczek, V., & Souza, A. P. (2012). The impact of structured teaching methods on the quality of education in Brazil. Economics of Education review, 31(5), 850-860.
 
18.
Lin, S. Y., & Scherz, S. D. (2014). Challenges facing Asian international graduate students in the US: Pedagogical considerations in higher education. Journal of International Students, 4(1), 16-33.
 
19.
Minniti, L. F. S., Melo Jr, J. S. M., Oliveira, R. D., & Salles, J. A. A. (2017). The use of case studies as a teaching method in Brazil. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 373-377.
 
20.
Mishra, S., & Nargundkar, R. (2015). An analysis of intensive mode pedagogy in management education in India. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(4), 408-419.
 
21.
Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206-221.
 
22.
Mukhamedov, G., Khodjamkulov, U., Shofkorov, A., & Makhmudov, K. (2020). Pedagogical education cluster: content and form. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 1(81), 250-257.
 
23.
Naik, G. L., Deshpande, M., Shivananda, D. C., Ajey, C. P., & Manjunath Patel, G. C. (2021). Online Teaching and Learning of Higher Education in India during COVID-19 Emergency Lockdown. Pedagogical Research, 6(1).
 
24.
Pache, A. C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494-510.
 
25.
Raman, A. (2013). Innovative Pedagogical methods for Imparting Management Education to Indian Students. International Journal of Computing, Communications and Networking.
 
26.
Singhal, A., Perez, L. E., Stevik, K., Mønness, E., & Svenkerud, P. J. (2020). Liberating structures as pedagogical innovation for inclusive learning: A pilot study in a Norwegian university. Journal of Creative Communications, 15(1), 35-52.
 
27.
Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463-478.
 
28.
Stephens*, P., Egil tønnessen, F., & Kyriacou, C. (2004). Teacher training and teacher education in England and Norway: a comparative study of policy goals. Comparative education, 40(1), 109-130.
 
29.
Suresh, V., & Kolluru, M. (2022). Pedagogy innovation for management graduates: application of design thinking. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3/4), 659-674.
 
30.
Takahashi, A. (2021). Teaching mathematics through problem-solving: A pedagogical approach from Japan. Routledge. Ahn, R., Catbagan, P., Tamayo, K., I, J. Y., Lopez, M., & Walker, P. (2015). Successful minority pedagogy in mathematics: US and Japanese case studies. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 87-102.
 
31.
Victorelli, G., Flório, F. M., Ramacciato, J. C., Motta, R. H. L., & de Souza Fonseca Silva, A. (2014). Impact of pedagogical method on Brazilian dental students’ waste management practice. Journal of dental education, 78(11), 1528-1533.
 
32.
Waller, Z. P. (2021). An Assessment of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Training Methods and Measures (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Dakota).
 
33.
Yuzyk, O. P., Vysochan, L. M., & Grytsyk, N. V. (2019). Innovative teaching methods in higher education institutions of Poland and Ukraine. Zeszyty naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Technicznej w Katowicach, (11).
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top