Human age and its importance in roman commercial law
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
University of Rzeszow, Institute of Legal Studies, Rzeszow, Poland
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Wojciech J. Kosior   

University of Rzeszow, Institute of Legal Studies, Rzeszow, Poland
Data nadesłania: 20-11-2021
Data ostatniej rewizji: 15-10-2022
Data akceptacji: 17-10-2022
Data publikacji: 29-11-2022
 
JoMS 2022;49(2):91–102
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
Within the commercial law the most important regulations are those which define when and what kind of business activities could be undertaken. In every legal system, regardless of whether we mean antique or modern law, there have always been and there are regulations that have specific effects depending on the age of a given person. Such regulations are known in all contemporary legal systems of the world in every branch of law. In the presented article the author has elaborated the influence of human age on persons’ trade rights in ancient Rome. Consequently it has occurred that in Roman law there were two age limits which played a significant role in commerce. The first one was the age of 14 years when a boy got full legal capacity, and the second one was the age of 25 years when he was becoming fully independent from any restrictions and special protection.

Material and methods:
Materials - ancient legal sources e.g. Roman legal texts etc., books, articles, Methods - critique analysis

Results:
Comparative remarks between Roman law and modern Polish law was achieved.

Conclusions:
Commercial rights are incorporated in private right, so there should not be any differentiation when we talk about availability to run business. But in practice, in ancient Rome gaining full legal capacity with the day of 14th birthday was not enough to act successfully in the trade market as a business partner. Such possibility was coming when a person reached the age of 25 years and become able to act independently. In modern Poland, even though limited legal capacity is sufficient to undertake legal acts with the consent of legal guardians, acting in business effectively with all necessary concessions and licenses, is possible if a person has full legal capacity.

 
REFERENCJE (36)
1.
Alvarez A. M. (1976). La tutela de los menores, Sevilla. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.
 
2.
Ankum H. (1992). Gab es im klassischen römischen Recht eine exceptio und eine replicatio legis Laetoriae?, [in:] Festschrift für Gunter Wesener zum 60. Geburtstag am 3. Juni 1992, Vestigia Iuris Romani, Leykam Verlag.
 
3.
Aubert J-J. (2004). The Republican Economy and Roman Law: Regulation, Promotion, or Reflection?, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, (ed.) I. Flower, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
 
4.
Berger A. (2002). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia. The Lawbook Exchange.
 
5.
Bove L. (1964). Voce „Minore età”, [in:] “Novissimo Digesto Italiano”, X/1964.
 
6.
Cathers B. (2003). Conversations with Teen Entrepreneurs: Success Secrets of the Younger Generation, Lincoln. iUniverse.
 
7.
Cheeseman H. R., Carlson R., Gac E. J. (1999). Contemporary Business Law: Asking the Right Questions, London. Pearson College Division.
 
8.
Di Salvo S. (1979). ‘Lex Laetoria’: Minore età e crisi sociale tra il III e il II a.C., Napoli. Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Camerino.
 
9.
Domingo R. (1996). Auctoritas En Derecho Romano [The Idea of Auctoritas in Ancient Roman Law], [in:] “Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos” 18/1996.
 
10.
du Plessis P. (2015). Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
 
11.
Fayer C. (2005). La familia romana: aspetti giuridici ed antiquari, L’erma di Bretschneider.
 
12.
Fellmeth A. X., Horwitz M. (2009). Guide to Latin in International Law, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
 
13.
Fernández de Buján A. (2003). Contribución al estudio histórico jurídico del arbitraje, [in:] “Revista Jurídica” 8/2003.
 
14.
Forcellini A. (2014). Lexicon Totius Latinitatis, Prati 1868 – 1875. BiblioLife.
 
15.
Heumann H. G. (1958). Handlexikon zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts, Graz. G. Fischer.
 
16.
Humbert M. (2010). Le status civitatis. Identité et identification du civis Romanus, [in:] “Homo”,“Caput”,“Persona”. La costruzione giuridica dell’identità nell’esperienza romana. Dall’epoca di Plauto a Ulpiano, (ed.) A. Corbino, M. Humbert, G. Negri, Pavia. IUSS Press.
 
17.
James T. E. (1960). The Age of Majority, [in:] “The American Journal of Legal History”, 4/22/1960.
 
18.
Kaser M.. (1984). Roman private law, (translated by R. Dannenbring), Butterworths.
 
19.
Kaser M. (1953). Vom Begriff des ‘commercium’, [in:] “Studi Arangio-Ruiz”, II, Napoli.
 
20.
Knothe H. G. (1982). Zur 7-Jahresgrenze der ‘infantia’ im antiken römischen Recht, [in:] SDHI 48/1982.
 
21.
Knothe H. G. (1983). Die Geschäftsfähigkeit der Minderjährigen in geschichtlicher Entwicklung, Frankfurt am Main, Bern, Lang.
 
22.
Kodrębski J. (1974). Sabinianie i Prokulianie. Szkoły prawa w Rzymie wczesnego cesarstwa, Łódź. Uniwersytet Łódzki.
 
23.
Kosior W. J. (2018). Kategorie i granice wieku oraz ich znaczenie w prawie rzymskim, Warszawa 2018 (unpublished doctoral thesis).
 
24.
Laes Ch., Strubbe J. (2014). Youth in the Roman Empire. The Young and the Restless Years?, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
 
25.
Laurence R. (2007). Gender, age, and identity: the female life course at Pompeii [in:] Age and ageing in the Roman Empire, (ed.) M. Harlow, R. Laurence, Portsmouth. Journal of Roman Archaeology.
 
26.
Meyer-Marthaler E. (1968). Römisches Recht in Rätien im frühen und hohen Mittelalter, Zürich. Leemann.
 
27.
Musumeci F. (2012). L’editto pretorio relativo ai minori di 25 anni e la sua interpretatio in età imperiale, [in:] “Iuris antiqui historia” 4.4/2012.
 
28.
Roselaar S. T. (2012). The Concept of Commercium in the Roman Republic, [in:] “Phoenix”, vol. 66/2012/3–4.
 
29.
Sirks B. (2018). Law, Commerce, and Finance in the Roman Empire, [in:] Trade, Commerce, and the State in the Roman World, (ed.) A. Wilson, A. Bowman, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
 
30.
Smith W. (2005). A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, (ed.) John Murray, London 1875. Fischer-Lescano A., Christensen R., Auctoritatis Interpositio: Die Dekonstruktion des Dezisionismus durch die Systemtheorie, [in:] “Der Staat” 2/44/2005.
 
31.
Sohm R. (1892). The Institutes of Roman law, London. Clarendon Press.
 
32.
Solazzi S. (1963). La forma della „tutoris auctoritatis” e della „patris auctoritas”, [in:] “Scritti” IV/1963.
 
33.
Tafaro S. (1991). La pubertà a Roma: profili giuridici, Bari. Cacucci.
 
34.
Watson A. (1967). The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
 
35.
Zabłocki J. (1992). Sebastiano Tafaro, Pubes e viripotens nella esperienza giuridica Romana, (Pubblicazloni della Facoltà Giuridica del Università dl Bari, Serie II, № 89, Editore Carucci), Bari 1988, pp. 239, [in:] “Prawo Kanoniczne” 35/1-2/1992.
 
36.
Żeber I. (2014). Kilka uwag o historii rzymskiego prawa handlowego, [in:] “Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis” No 3602/Prawo CCCXVI/2/2014.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031