PRACA POGLĄDOWA
Destruction of Cultural Heritage as Exemplified by the Conflict in Ukraine
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Pomeranian University in Słupsk
 
2
Uniwersytet Pomorski w Słupsku
 
3
Rzeszow University of Technology
 
4
General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces
 
 
Data nadesłania: 18-04-2025
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 13-10-2025
 
 
Data akceptacji: 17-11-2025
 
 
Data publikacji: 29-12-2025
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Izabela Szkurłat   

Uniwersytet Pomorski w Słupsku
 
 
JoMS 2025;64(4):217-226
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Wars and armed conflicts have a negative impact on the cultural heritage of countries where military operations are carried out. Cultural assets are important as a historical value for a given society, a scientific value due to their cognitive value or the preservation of identity and culture, among others. It is cultural identity that influences the sense of belonging to a given society, a given group and the values it adopts. Consequently, we can conclude that through the role of cultural assets in the context of social identity, we can also talk about building social resilience, which is supposed to lead to the capacity for survival, recovery and strong bonds. The article points to international regulations that are not effective enough to stop the destruction of cultural heritage in Ukraine. The aim of this article is to point out examples of the destruction and plundering of cultural property taking place in Ukraine and the actions of both the Ukrainian side and international efforts to preserve it. A very important process is the documentation and cataloguing of cultural property and the possibility of storing movable cultural property outside the area of war or armed conflict. In the years to come, the damage done in Ukraine will require considerable financial and personnel resources to reconstruct. There is also a risk that some cultural property will never be returned to the Ukrainian side.
Licencja
REFERENCJE (20)
1.
Alafandi, R., Rahim, A.A. (2014). Umayyad mosque in Aleppo yesterday, today and tomorrow, International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 2014,.
 
2.
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted in Paris on 16 November 1972 by the General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization at its seventeenth session. Dz.U. /Journal of Laws/ of 1976, no. 32, item 190.
 
3.
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention and Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, signed in The Hague on 14 May 1954. Dz.U. /Journal of Laws/ of 1957, no. 46, item 212.
 
4.
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, adopted in Paris on 17 November 1970. Dz.U. /Journal of Laws/ of 1974, no. 20, item 106.
 
5.
Helms, S. (2024). International Cultural Property Protection and Law: Ukraine and Beyond, Hollins University.
 
6.
https://icom.museum/wp-content... (accessed on 10.10.2024).
 
7.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark... (accessed on 17.10.2024).
 
9.
https://www.1944.pl/en/article... (accessed on 10.10.2024); https://www.europarl.europa.eu... (accessed on 10.10.2024).
 
10.
https://www.ne-mo.org/advocacy... (accessed on 10.10.2024).
 
11.
https://www.sucho.org/about (accessed on 10.10.2024).
 
12.
 
13.
Jawad, A., Bokhari M. (2022). Measuring the Protection of Cultural Property Under International Humanitarian Laws: Analysis of Russia-Ukraine Conflict, Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS), Volume 4, Issue 3,.
 
14.
Kossiakoff, M. (2004). The Art of War: The Protection of Cultural Property during the Siege of Sarajevo (1992-95), DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law,.
 
15.
Powderly, J., Strecker, A. (2023). Heritage Destruction and the War on Ukraine, [in] Heritage Destruction, Human Rights and International Law.
 
16.
Putri, M. K. A., Wattimena, K. A. (2024). Conceptual and Juridical Review of the Destruction of Cultural Property in the Ukraine – Russia War, Jurnal Suara Hukum.
 
17.
Reza ‘Husseini’, S. (2012). Destruction of Bamiyan Buddhas Taliban iconoclasm and Hazara response, Himalayan and Central Asian Studies.
 
18.
Second Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict signed in The Hague on 14 May 1954, adopted in The Hague on 26 March 1999. Dz.U. /Journal of Laws/ of 2012, item 248.
 
19.
Shydlovskyi, P., Kuijt, P., Skorokhod, V., Zotsenko, I., Ivakin, V., Donaruma, W., Field, S. (2023).The tools of war: conflict and the destruction of Ukrainian cultural heritage, Antiquity.
 
20.
UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, adopted in Paris on 17 October 2003. Dz.U. /Journal of Laws/ of 2011, no. 172, item 1018.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top