Anti-progressive conditions for the functioning of enterprises; innovation in the opinion of producers of technical means of agricultural transport – the context of its implementation and its barriers
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski
WSB Gdańsk
Uniwersytet Gdański
Data nadesłania: 13-01-2023
Data ostatniej rewizji: 20-05-2023
Data akceptacji: 23-05-2023
Data publikacji: 29-07-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Przemysław Niewiadomski   

Uniwersytet Zielonogórski
JoMS 2023;51(2):89-113
The subject of the study is the issue of innovation, or more precisely, an attempt to present potential barriers preventing or limiting its implementation. The main objective of the research is to identify key anti-innovation factors (composition of key barriers) and to rank them (enterprise self-evaluation).

Material and methods:
The above objectives resulted in detailed tasks including an in-depth literature search, verification of available expert knowledge and research of a representative group of entities. The research was carried out by defining a set of the most important barriers to innovation. This enabled further exploration of the issue as part of the work on the method, expert discussions and in-depth sectoral analysis (agricultural machinery - technical means of agricultural transport).

The results confirmed that the adopted research method concept is a helpful evaluation instrument. Conclusions developed as part of the surveyed entities' assessment, related to anti-innovation determinants, proved to be important for the final decisions. Theoretical and empirical considerations were based on the formulated research hypothesis and the assumptions constituting the starting point. Although the research field has been narrowed down to the agricultural machinery sector, attention has been paid to the cognitive value of work in relation to other sectors of the economy.

In the context of the conducted research, a catalog of barriers that significantly affect the implementation of innovations was indicated. An important point on the development map of the surveyed enterprises will be meeting the challenges related to the barriers' elimination. It is on the part of enterprises to take appropriate actions aimed at increasing efficiency and creating new management models.

Audretsch, D.B., Link, A.N. (2018). Innovation capital, 43, 1760-1767. The Journal of Technology Transfer.
AlAstal, A.Y. (2023). Emerging technological innovation in Gaza Strip municipalities: an entrepreneurial approach. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 27.
Ayinaddis, S.G. (2023). The effect of innovation orientation on firm performance: evidence from micro and small manufacturing firms in selected towns of Awi Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 26.
Ayinaddis, S.G., Taye, B.A., Yirsaw, B.G. (2023). Examining the effect of electronic banking service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty: an implication for technological innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 22.
Bate, A.F., Wachira, E.W., Danka, S. (2023). The determinants of innovation performance: an income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 20.
Bessant, J. (2003). High involvement innovation. Wiley.
Bessant, J., Tidd, J. (2014). Strategic innovation management. Wiley.
Bessant, J., Tidd, J. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Wiley.
Block, J. H., Thurik, R., Zhou, H. (2013). What turns knowledge into innovativeproducts? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers, 23(4), 693-718. Journal ofEvolutionary Economics.
Byvshev, V., Parfenteva, K., Panteleeva, I. et al. (2023). Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of regional infrastructure facilities to support scientific, technical and innovation activities in the context of the synergy effect: analysis, formation and study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11, 65 (2022).
Carree, M.A. (2003). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comment, 14(1), 109-115. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
Drucker, P. (2006). The Practice of Management. Harper Business, London.
Fagerberg, J. (2000). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comparative study, 11(4), 393-411. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge.
Heller, B., Amir, A., Waxman, R. et al. (2023). Hack your organizational innovation: literature review and integrative model for running hackathons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 6.
Knell, M., Radošević, S. (1999). FDI, technology transfer and growth in economic theory. w: G. Hunya (red.) Integration through Foreign Direct Investment: Making Central European Industries Competitive. Cheltenham.
Krugman, P. (1979). A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distributionof income, 87(2), 253-266. Journal of political economy.
Laursen, K., Salter, A.J. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms, 27, 131-150. Southern Medical Journal.
Lubián, F. (2023). Valuing Innovation. Published in Revista de Análisis Financiero. April.
Mitcheltree, C.M. (2023). Towards a sense of urgency for innovation realization: a case study on complacency asymmetries in interorganizational relations. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 11.
Mangematin, V., Baden Fuller C. (2008). Global contests in the production of business knowledge, 41(1), 117-139. Long Range Planning.
Myers, S., Marquis, D.G. (1969), Successful industrial innovations: a study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms, National Science Foundation, Washington.
Niewiadomski, P. (2022). Bariery wdrażania koncepcji przemysłu 4.0 w opinii producentów technicznych środków transportu rolniczego. w: J. Patalas-Maliszewska, J. Jakubowski, A. Kaczmarek-Pawelska (red.) Współpraca nauki i biznesu w inżynierii produkcji, 29-48. Polskie Towarzystwo Zarządzania Innowacjami, Zielona Góra.
Nyström, H. (1990). Technological and Market Innovation: Strategies for Product andCompany Development. Wiley, Chichester.
Ozturk, F., Ozturk, S. (2018). Exploring the Nexus of Coal Consumption, Economic Growth, Energy Prices and Technological Innovation in Turkey, 8, 1406-1414. Asian Economic and Financial Review.
Panek-Owsiańska, M. (2013). Innowacje społeczne; w: Natalia Ćwik (red.), Wspólna odpowiedzialność. Rola innowacji. Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu, Warszawa.
Rubin, J. Wdrożenie koncepcji Przemysłu 4.0 to zmiana organizacyjna. Dostęp 06.06.2022 z https://elearning.przemyslprzy....
Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function, 39(3), 312-320. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Spännäri, J, Juntunen, E, Pessi, AB, Stahle, P. (2023). Compassion - A key to innovation: What promotes and what prevents innovation in organizations? Frontiers in Psychology, 14:1058544.
Tidd, J., Bessant J., Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation - Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (3rd Ed.). John Wiley &Sons, UK.
Tidd, J., Thuriaux-Alemán B. (2016). Innovation management practices: Cross-sectorial adoption, variation andeffectiveness, 46(3), 1024-1043. R&D Management.
Van der Duin, P.A. (2006). Qualitative Futures Research for Innovation. Eburon AcademicPublishers, Delft, The Netherlands.
Zhang, G., Tang, C., (2017). How could firm's internal R&D collaboration bring moreinnovation? 125, 299-308. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top