About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Ethical Code for authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Ethical Code or Peer Reviewers
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
An interdisciplinary approach to environmental protection: legal, economic, technological, and philosophical considerations
1
UWM Wydział Prawa i Administracji
Submission date: 2021-02-18
Acceptance date: 2021-09-30
Publication date: 2021-12-22
JoMS 2021;47(2):497-520
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives
This paper aims to present the relations between legal, economic, technological instruments and the factors affecting the dominating standard of social awareness which affects ethical choices in the scope of environmental protection.
Material and methods
The article uses the method of analysis and criticism of the literature as well as dogmatic and legal.
Results
Effective environmental protection demands an interdisciplinary approach. It should rest on the foundation of legal regulations setting out rules for the use and protection of natural resources with the principle of sustainable development. People need these resources for survival but they contribute to their degradation. To secure the basic rights of people, the environment and economic growth, effective environmental protection is a must.
Conclusions
This analysis served to develop a model that integrates these elements for the purpose of effective environmental protection. In a nutshell, effective environmental protection cannot be attained through legal instruments alone; they must be coordinated – the use of the best available techniques – with adequate economic tools and ethical standing of the society.
REFERENCES (58)
2.
Adger, N.W., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S. and Seyfang, G. (2003). Governance for sustainability: towards a thick' analysis of environmental decision making. Environment and Planning A 35, p. 1095–1110.
3.
Batavia, Ch., Bruskotter, J.T. and Nelson, M.P. (2020). Pathways from Environmental Ethics to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Insights from Psychology. Environmental Values 29, p. 317–337.
7.
Bonar, A. (2001). Ochrona środowiska – interdyscyplinarna dziedzina wiedzy. Ochrona Środowiska 1, p. 1-15.
8.
Bosselman, K. and Grinlinton D. (2002). Environmental Law for a Sustainable Society. Auckland: New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law.
9.
Carter, C. (2020). The Ethics of Human Intervention on Behalf of 'Others. Environmental Values 29(1), p. 1–7.
10.
Ciechanowicz-McLean, J. (2004). Międzynarodowe prawo ochrony środowiska. Warsaw: CH Beck.
11.
Ciechanowicz-McLean, J. (2016). Environmental Justice jako rodzaj sprawiedliwości. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze 35, p. 119–130.
12.
Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters done at Aarhus, Denmark, on 25 June 1998 (LJ 78, item 706).
13.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund (OJ L 130, 25.5.1994, p. 1–13).
14.
Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (1995). Ekologia głęboka. Warszawa: Pusty Obłok Press.
15.
Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 56).
16.
Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law (OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p. 28–37).
17.
Dołęga, J.M. (1999). Problematyka ochrony środowiska społeczno-przyrodniczego w sozologii i Ekofilozofii. in: Dołęga, J.M. and Czartoszewski, J.W. (ed.), Ochrona środowiska w filozofii i teologii (pp. 10–26). Warsaw: Akademia Teologii Katolickiej.
18.
EC (2010). Report from The Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Under Article 14(2) of Directive 2004/35/CE on the environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. COM/2010/0581 final.
19.
EC (2019-24). 6 Commission priorities for 2019-24. Obtained (7.07.2020) from https://ec.europa.eu/info/stra....
20.
EC (2019). Directive on liability for the environment. Obtained (17.07.2020) from https://ec.europa.eu/environme... /ELD factsheet_PL.pdf 2019.
21.
Goliński, M. (2011). Społeczeństwo informacyjne. Geneza koncepcji i problematyka pomiaru. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
22.
Górka, K., Poskrobko, B. and Radecki, W. (2001). Ochrona środowiska. Problemy społeczne, ekonomiczne i prawne. Warsaw: PWE.
23.
Hochschild, A.R. (2003). The Commercialization of Intimate Life; Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley: University of California.
24.
Iwińska, K., Jones, M., Kraszewska, M. (2018). Widening Interdisciplinary Sustainability Education. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.
25.
Jonas, Hans. (1996). Zasada odpowiedzialności. Etyka dla cywilizacji technicznej. Kraków: Platan.
27.
Kammen, D.M. (2013). Complexity and interdisciplinary approaches to environmental research. Environmental Research Letters 8 (010201).
28.
Karpus, K. (2016). Sprawiedliwość ekologiczna a założenia modelu odpowiedzialności za gospodarowanie odpadami. in: Bojar-Fijałkowski, T. (ed.), Sprawiedliwość ekologiczna w prawie i praktyce (pp. 135–144). Gdańsk: UG.
29.
Kenig-Witkowska, M.M. (2011). Międzynarodowe prawo środowiska. Wybrane zagadnienia systemowe. Warszawa: Lex a Wolters Kluwer business.
31.
Kozłowski, S. (1993). Konferencja „Środowisko i Rozwój” w Brazylii w roku 1992. Kosmos 42(1), p. 15–32.
32.
Krasnodębski, Z. (1991). Upadek idei postępu. Warsaw: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
34.
Marcuse, H. (1991). Człowiek jednowymiarowy. Badania nad ideologią rozwiniętego społeczeństwa przemysłowego. Warsaw: PWN.
35.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: the Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto.
36.
McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. Berkeley: Gingko.
38.
Namiesnik, J. (1999). Protection of the Environment - the Most Important Challange for the System of Education. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 8(5), p. 293–297.
39.
Papuziński, A. (2014). Zrównoważony rozwój w kontekście teorii sprawiedliwości międzygeneracyjnej. Próba konkretyzacji problemu. Studies in Global Ethics and Global Education 2, p. 12–27.
40.
Pereira, J. (2015). Environmental issues and international relations, a new global (dis)order – the role of International Relations in promoting a concerted international system. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 58(1).
41.
Pluta, M. (1998). Emmanuela Lévinasa etyka odpowiedzialności. Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne 7, p. 133–148.
42.
Radecki, W. (2010). Prawo karne środowiska. Część I. Ewolucja polskiego prawa karnego środowiska. Journal of Ecology Health 14(5), p. 215–220.
43.
Rosencranz, A. (2003). The Origin and Emergence of International Environmental Norms. International and Comparative Law Review 26(3), p. 309–320.
44.
Rosicki, R. (2010). Międzynarodowe i europejskie koncepcje zrównoważonego rozwoju. Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny 4, p. 44–56.
45.
Schmitz, C.L., Matyók, T., Sloan, L.M. and James, Ch. (2012). Environmental sustainability. Educating social workers for interdisciplinary practice. in: Gray, M., Coates, J. and Hetherington T. (ed.), Environmental Social Work (pp. 260–279). Routledge.
46.
Sej-Kolasa, M. (2009). The Role of EU Funds in Financing Environment Protection. Economics & Sociology 2(1), p. 138–146.
47.
Semerjian, L., El-Fadel, M., Zurayk, R. and Nuwayhid, I. (2004). Interdisciplinary Approach to Environmental Education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 130(3), 173.
48.
Seed, J. (1994). Antropocentryzm. in: Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (ed.), Ekologia głęboka (pp. 316–327). Warsaw: Pusty Obłok.
51.
Skolimowski, H. (1991). Medytacje o prawdziwych wartościach człowieka, który poszukuje sensu życia. Wrocław: Astrum.
52.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: Volume One. London: printed for Strahan. Obtained (7.07.2020) from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/h... /1842/1455.
53.
Szymańska, U. and Zębek, E. (2014). Ochrona środowiska naturalnego jako interdyscyplinarna dziedzina wiedzy. Olsztyn: UWM.
54.
Tošić, J. (2006). Ecocriticism – interdisciplinary study of literature and environment. Facta Universitatis Series: Working and Living Environmental Protection 3(1), p. 43–50.
55.
Treaty of Maastricht on European Union of 7 February 1992 (LJ of 2004, No. 90, item 864/30).
56.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFU) - consolidated version (OJ C 326, 26.10.2012).
57.
Winnicki, T. and Głowiak, B. (1978). Management of large‐scale interdisciplinary environmental programmes. R&D Management 8(1), p. 106–158.
58.
Zielinski, T., Sagan, I. and Surosz, W. (2018). Interdisciplinary Approaches for Sustainable Development Goals. Economic Growth, Social Inclusion and Environmental Protection. Spinger.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
