ORIGINAL PAPER
Visegrad Reconsidered – the prospects of the most efficient regional cooperation format in Central Europe at the time
 
More details
Hide details
1
Paneuropean University, Bratislava, Slovakia
 
2
Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
 
 
Submission date: 2025-08-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-11-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-17
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomáš Strážay   

Paneuropean University, Bratislava, Slovakia
 
 
JoMS 2025;64(4):28-53
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The article focuses on the development of subregional cooperation in Central Europe. The emphasis is on the Visegrad Four format consisting of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. The article tries to answer the question whether it is still beneficial for participating countries to cooperate in the V4 framework. The article also aims to identify both possibilities and constraints that would frame cooperation in the V4 format in the foreseeable future, as well as to suggest some areas of cooperation.

Material and methods:
The approaches of Alexander Wendt's social constructivism are employed. The Visegrad framework of cooperation can be understood as a social structure that changes over time, as its identities and interests gradually change – according to the principle of mutual, constantly ongoing constitution of the structure and actors. The constructivist approach also allows to explain the behavior of individual actors (V4 countries) in different periods of the functioning of the Visegrad Group.

Results:
The willingness of individual countries to cooperate remains to be an essential condition for the functioning of the Visegrad cooperation. The positioning of the V4 countries in the EU and international relations in general, formation of their foreign and security policies, as well as their mutual interaction will play a major role. The impact of external environment and influence of external stakeholders also cannot be neglected.

Conclusions:
The article analysed the Visegrad Group as an interesting example of a subregional cooperation format from the point of view of international relations. The constructivist approach, which was employed, enabled us to identify different phases of evolution of the Visegrad cooperation in the past, as well to suggest possible ways of development in the future.
FUNDING
VEGA č. 1/0661/23
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Annex to the Content of Visegrad Cooperation. (2000). Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/c....
 
2.
Balogh, P., Gál, Z., Hajdú, Z., Rácz, S., & Scott, J. W. (2022). On the (geo)political salience of the geo-graphical imaginations: A central European perspective, 63 (6), 691–703. Euroasian Geography and Economics.
 
3.
Contents of Visegrad cooperation. (1999). Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/c....
 
4.
Declaration on Cooperation between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Hungary in Striving for European Integration (1991). Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/h....
 
5.
Declaration of Prime Ministers of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland and the Slovak Republic on the Cooperation of the Visegrad Group countries after their accession to the European Union, (2004). Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/2....
 
6.
Evans, G., Newnham, R. (1998). The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations. Penguin Publishing House.
 
7.
Fawn, R. (2024). Castle on a Hill. The Visegrad Group, Regionalism and the Remaking of Europe. Georgetown University Press.
 
8.
Fearon, J., Wendt, A. (2006). Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. in: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 52-72. Sage.
 
9.
Haas, E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. University of Notre Dame Press.
 
10.
Haas, E.B. (1961). International Integration. The European and the Universal Process, 15 (3), 366-392. International Organization.
 
11.
Haas, E.B. (1970). The study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing, 24 (4), 607-646. International Organization.
 
12.
Haas, E.B. (1976). Turbulent fields of the theory of regional integration, 30 (2), 173-212. International Organization.
 
13.
Hettne, B. (1999). Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation. in: B. Hettne, A. Inotai, O. Sunkel (eds), Globalism and the New Regionalism. The New Regionalism, 1-24. Palgrave Macmillan.
 
14.
Gamble, A., Payne, A. (eds.). (1996). Regionalism and World Order.
 
15.
Red Globe Press.
 
16.
Guidelines on the future areas of Visegrad co-operation, 2004. Retrieved 12.08.2025 from www.visegradgroup.eu/cooperation/guidelines-on-the-future-110412.
 
17.
Gyárfášová, O., Mesežnikov, G. (2016). 25 Years of the V4 as Seen by the Public. Institute of Public Affairs.
 
18.
Gyárfášová, O., Mesežnikov, G. (2021). V4 v názoroch verejnosti – skúsenosti a nové výzvy. Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
 
19.
Gyárfášová, O., Mesežnikov, G. (2024). V4 at the Time of Polycrisis – Public Perception. Institute of Public Affairs.
 
20.
International Visegrad Fund. (2025). Retrieved 7.11.2025 from https://www.visegradfund.org/.
 
21.
Irmanová, E., Kopeček, M., Kunštát, M., Vykoukal, J. (2003). Visegrád mezi minulostí a budoucností. in: J. Vykoukal (ed.), Visegrád – možnosti a meze středoevropské spolupráce, 351-367. Dokořán.
 
22.
Joint Statement adopted at the Trilateral Leaders´ Summit of Slovakia, Hungary and Serbia on 22 October 2024. Retrieved 12.08.2025 from www.vlada.gov.sk.
 
23.
Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton University Press.
 
24.
Kratochvíl, P. (2008). Teorie evropské integrace. Portál.
 
25.
Lamour, C. (2022). A radical-right populist definition of cross-national regionalism in Europe: Shaping power geometries at the regional scale beyond state borders, 46 (1), 8–25. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
 
26.
Lukášek L. (2010). Visegrádská skupina a její vývoj v letech 1991-2004. Karolinum.
 
27.
Marušiak, J. (2013). Instead of Introduction – How Much is Visegrad Present in Europe?. in: J. Marušiak et al., Is Visegrad Still a Central European “Trade Mark?, 9-25. Institute of Political Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, VEDA.
 
28.
Marušiak, J. (2025). Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its impact on the energy cooperation of Visegrad Group countries. in: A. Figulová, M. Mišík (eds.), EU Energy and Climate Policy after COVID-19 and the Invasion of Ukraine: Decarbonisation and Security in Transition, 95-118. Routledge.
 
29.
Mitrany, D. (1943). A Working Peace System. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
 
30.
Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics Among Nations. Alfred A. Knopf.
 
31.
Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence. Longman.
 
32.
Office of the Government of the Slovak Republic. (2024). Fico: EÚ nepotrebuje redistribúciu migrantov, ale ochranu vonkajších hraníc. Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.vlada.gov.sk/tlaco....
 
33.
Pehe, J. (2004). Skončí visegrádská spolupráce?. Retrieved 21.08.2025 from www.visegradinfo.com.
 
34.
Poznar, A., Havlík, V. (2025). From complementary and opportunistic sub-regionalism to anti-systemic attitudes? Exploring the post-2022 attitudes of visegrad member states to cooperation, 26 (4), 937-954. European Politics and Society.
 
35.
Programové vyhlásenie vlády Slovenskej republiky 2023 – 2027. Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Dynami....
 
36.
Schmidt, A. (2016). Friends forever? The Role of the Visegrad Group and European Integration, 12 (3), 113-140. Politics in Central Europe.
 
37.
Strážay, T. (2014). Neither beautiful nor ugly, but functional : a pragmatic view on the Visegrad Group, 2014 (2), 37-47. Contemporary European Studies.
 
38.
Strážay, T. (2018). Internal and external aspects of the Visegrád 4 cooperation. in: C. Schweiger, A. Visvizi (eds.), Central and Eastern Europe in the EU: challenges and perspectives under crisis conditions, 165-176. Routledge.
 
39.
Terem,P., Lenč, M. (2011). Central European Identity – Visegrad Group. in: F. Maron, G. Pozarlik (eds.) Identités, citoyennetés et démocratie : 20 ans aprés = Identities, citizenship and democracy : 20 years after : actes de la Conférence internationale de Charleroi 22-24/10/2010, 79-94. Bruylant.
 
40.
The Bratislava Declaration of the Prime Ministers of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland and the Slovak Republic on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Visegrad Group, 2011. Retrieved 12.08.2025 from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/2....
 
41.
Waisová, Š. (2009). Regionální integrační procesy. Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, s.r.o.
 
42.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
 
43.
Wendt, A.(2007). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top