PL EN
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Poland's strategic potential and capabilities to respond to CBRN threats
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
ITTI
 
 
Data nadesłania: 21-08-2023
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 19-04-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 15-05-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 27-06-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Łukasz Szklarski   

ITTI
 
 
JoMS 2024;56(2):437-464
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The article includes a systemic analysis of Poland's potential and response capabilities to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) threats. As a result of the conducted research, the dominant threats, technological resources, legal framework and socio-political reactions related to CBRN incidents in Poland were shown. In addition, Poland's technological capabilities in the detection of chemical agents, gamma and nucleoids were presented. The important role of protective clothing in responding to CBRN threats was emphasized.

Material and methods:
In order to implement the adopted research assumptions, the method of analysis was used consisting in quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content contained in the analyzed documents, literature, legal acts, their ordering and interpretation in terms of the research objective.

Results:
The article highlights the multifaceted nature of the Polish approach, which includes understanding CBRN threats, investing in advanced detection technologies, ensuring the security of response through protective equipment, implementing robust civil protection measures, and adhering to a comprehensive legal framework. The discussion additionally sheds light on the key role of international cooperation in the Polish CBRN strategy. Basically, the article presents Polish preparations as a comprehensive approach combining technological knowledge, legal infrastructure, public security measures

Conclusions:
Poland's strategic preparation for potential CBRN incidents is an ongoing process. While significant progress has been made, the constantly evolving nature of CBRN threats requires a continuous commitment to policy improvement, technological innovation, capacity building and international cooperation.

 
REFERENCJE (69)
1.
Act of Crisis Management. (2007). Journal of Laws 2007, No. 89, item 590.
 
2.
Act on genetically rejected organisms. (2001). Act of 22 June 2001 on genetically rejected organisms. Journal of Laws of 2001, No. 76, item 811.
 
3.
Act on the Police. (1990). The Act of 6 April 1990 on the Police.
 
4.
Amitai, G. (2010). Decontamination of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents with One, 31(15), pp. 4417–4425. Multifunctional Biomaterials.
 
5.
Atomic Law. (2019). Announcement of the Marshal of the Sejm of the Commonwealth of Poland on the establishment of a consolidated text of the Atomic Law. Journal of Laws, Warsaw, September 20, 2019.
 
6.
Blatny, J.M., Fykse, E.M., Olsen, J.S., Skogan, G., Aarskaug, T. (2008). Identifying Environmental Biohazards and Their Challenges, Published Online: https://www.resrchintl.com/Doc.... Access 22.05.2024.
 
7.
Carter, H. (2020). Recommendations to Improve Public Engagement with Pre-Incident Information Material for Initial Response to a Chemical, Biological, Radiological, or Nuclear (CBRN) Incident, 51. Systematic Review, Elsevier International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.
 
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Standard: Occupational exposure to heat and hot environments. U.S. Government Printing House.
 
9.
Civil Protection in Crisis Management and Civil Defence. (2017). Inspection results report. Warsaw. NIK.
 
10.
Col, J.-M. (2007). Disaster Management: the Role of Local Government, 57, pp. 114–124. PAR.
 
11.
Coombs, W.T. (2015). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding. Sage publications.
 
12.
Danzig, R., Sageman, M., Leighton, T., Hough, L., Yuki, H., Kotani, R., Hosford, Z. (2011). Aum Shinrikyo: Insight Into How Terrorists Develop Biological and Chemical Weapons. Center for New American Security.
 
13.
Eckerman, I. (2005). The Bhopal Saga: Causes and Consequences of the World’s Greatest Industrial Disaster. Hyderabad, India: Universities Press.
 
14.
Eitzen, E.M., Jr. (1997). Use of Biological Weapons, 437–450, in: Sidell, F.R., Takafuji, E.T. (eds), (1997). Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General at TMM, Borden Institute, Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr.
 
15.
Ellison, H. (2007). Handbook of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents. CRC Press.
 
16.
European Commission. (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new EU approach to detecting and mitigating CBRN-E threats, May 2014. Published Online: https://goo.gl/CrQXZe. Access 10.08.2017.
 
17.
European Council. (2005). EU Counter Terrorism Strategy, November 30, 2005, Published Online: https://goo.gl/hCwA3k. Access 22.10.2018.
 
18.
Ewing, R.G., Atkinson, D.A., Eiceman, G.A. (2001). A Critical Review of Ion Mobility Spectrometry for the Detection of Explosives and Explosive Compounds, 54(3), pp. 515–529. Talent.
 
19.
FEMA. (1996). All Hazards Emergency Operations Planning Guide. SLG 101: All Hazards Emergency Operations Planning Guide (9/96).
 
20.
Ferguson, C.D., Kazi, T., Perera, J. (2003). Commercial Radioactive Sources: Investigating Safety Risks. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies.
 
21.
Ferraro, J.R., Krishman, K. (2012). Practical Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: Industrial and Laboratory Chemical Analysis. Elsevier.
 
22.
Ganor, B. (2016). Global Alert: The Rationality of Contemporary Islamic Terrorism and the Challenge to the Liberal Democratic World. Columbia University Press.
 
23.
García-León, M. (2022). Environmental Radioactivity Detection Springer Nature, Springer.
 
24.
Goniewicz, K., Osiak, B., Pawłowski, W. (2021). Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response in Poland: Mitigation Prevention, Surveillance and Planning, 15(16). Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.
 
25.
Government Security Center. (2021). Report on a Threat to National Security The Council of Ministers, by Resolution No. 34/2021 of March 11, 2021, at the beginning (fifth) based on the Report on a threat to national security. Published Online: https://www.gov.pl/web/rcb/rap.... Access 22.05.2024.
 
26.
Government Security Center. (2021a). National Crisis Management Plan. Update 2021/2022. Published Online: https://www.gov.pl/web/rcb/kra.... Access 22.05.2024.
 
27.
Guillemin, J. (2005). Bioweapons: From the Invention of State-Sponsored Programs to Modern Bioterrorism. Columbia University Press.
 
28.
IAEA. (1979). Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, IAEA INFCIRC/274 & IAEA (2021) Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material IAEA INFCIRC/274/Rev.1/Mod.1/cor.
 
29.
IAEA. (2013). Nuclear Safety Action Plan Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(4), pp. 302–306.
 
30.
International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018). Radiation Protection of the Population and the Environment IAEA General Safety Guide.
 
31.
Jaworowski, Z. (2004). Chernobyl, Nuclear Waste and Nature, 15(5), pp. 807–824. Energy and Environment.
 
32.
Jenkins, B.M. (1985). Probability of nuclear terrorism. RAND.
 
33.
Kalinowski, R. (2020). Civil Defense and Crisis Management in Poland from a Systemic Perspective, 52, 3(197), pp. 513–525. Scientific Journal of Land Forces.
 
34.
Kanu, A.B., Dwivedi, P., Tam, M., Matz, L., Hill, H.H., Jr. (2008). Ion Mobility – Mass Spectrometry, 43, pp. 1–22. Journal Of Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrum.
 
35.
Knoll, G.F. (2010). Radiation Detection and Measurement (4th Edition), Wiley.
 
36.
Koblentz, G.D. (2009). Live Weapons: Biological Warfare and International Security, 272. Cornell University Press.
 
37.
Koblentz, G.D. (2010). Reconsidering Biosafety: Calibrating Biohazards and Responses, 34(4). International Security.
 
38.
Kristensen, H.M., Norris, R.S. (2013). Global Stockpiles of Nuclear Weapons, 1945–2010, 69(5), 75–81. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Published Online: https://files.givewell.org/fil.... Access 22.05.2024.
 
39.
Leitenberg, M. (2001). Bioweapons in the Twentieth Century: Review and Analysis, 27(4), pp. 267–320. Crit Rev Microbiol.
 
40.
Lyons, C., Colton, D. (2012). Airborne Measuring System in Japan, 102(5), pp. 509–515. Health Physics.
 
41.
Mauroni, A.J. (2003). Chemical and Biological Weapons: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO.
 
42.
Mauroni, A.J. (2006). Chemical and Biological Weapons: Reference Manual (2nd Edition), 23–48. Holtzbrinck.
 
43.
Mihalczo, J., Mullens, J. (2012). Nuclear Materials Identification System with Gamma Ray Imaging and Spectrometry for Plutonium, Highly Enriched Uranium, Explosives and Other Materials, Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy US, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
 
44.
Szklarski, Ł. (2024). CBRN Threats – Advancing National Security Through Interdisciplinary Innovations: An Analytical Framework For Radiological And Nuclear Hazard Detection Technologies, pp. 201-222. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP 2(88).
 
45.
National Research Council. (1997). Politics and Global Affairs. The Committee on International Security and Arms Control. Office of International Affairs Proliferation Concerns Assessment of U.S. efforts to contain nuclear and other hazardous materials and technologies in the former Soviet Union. Press of the National Academy.
 
46.
Parachini, J. (2003). Putting WMD Terrorism in Perspective, 26(4), 37–50. Washington Quarterly.
 
47.
Perkins, J.L., Stull, J.O. (1989). Performance of Chemical Protective Clothing in Chemical Emergencies. ASTM International. Published Online: https://www.semanticscholar.or.... Access 22.05.2024.
 
48.
Perl, R. (2003). Terrorism, the Future, and US Foreign Policy. Congressional Research Service.
 
49.
Peto, J., Alwan, N.A., Godfrey, K.M., Burgess, R.A., Hunter, D.J., Riboli, E., Romer, P. (2020). Universal Weekly Testing as a Strategy to Emerge from COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK, 395(10234), pp. 1420–1421. Lancet.
 
50.
Phelan, A.L., Katz, R., Gostin, L.O. (2020). The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China. Challenges for Global Health Governance. JAMA Network. Published Online: January 30, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1097. Access 22.05.2024.
 
51.
Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies. (2021). EU Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Preparedness and Response EP/EXPO/SEDE/FWC/2019-01/Lot4/R/04.
 
52.
Radiation Studies Branch Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). Population Monitoring in Radiation Emergencies: A Guide for State and Local Public Health Planners Radiation Research Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health.
 
53.
Regulation of the Minister of the Interior and Administration of 3 July 2017 on the detailed organization of the national rescue and firefighting system (Journal of Laws 2017, item 1319).
 
54.
Rehak, D., Ales, B., Dvorak, Z., Hromada, M. (2020). Security and Protection in GI Global’s Technical Infrastructure. IGI Global.
 
55.
Rietiker, D. (2014). The Relevance of Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: An Analysis According to the Rules of Interpretation of the Treaty Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law. Volume I, pp. 47–84.
 
56.
Robinson, J.P.P. (1996). Implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, 72(1), pp. 73–90. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944–).
 
57.
Samuel Colins Decontamination of Mass Victims of Chemical Accidents. (2021). Research Findings and Future Priorities Int. J. Environment. Rez. Public Health.
 
58.
Schindler, D., Toman, J. (2004). Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, Brill.
 
59.
Steinhauser, G., Brandl, A., Johnson, T.E. (2014). Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Accidents: an Overview of the Environmental Impact. The Science of the Whole Environment, 470–471, February 1, 2014. Science of The Total Environment.
 
60.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). 2016. Emergency Response Guide. Lulu.com.
 
61.
Vogel, K.M. (2012). Spectral Menace or Impending Danger? New Bioweapons Threat Assessment Framework. Johns Hopkins University Press.
 
62.
Wang, F., Gao, Ch. (2014). Protective Clothing: Managing Thermal Stress. Elsevier.
 
63.
Wiśniewska, K., Lewandowska, A. (2019). Air Quality at Two Stations (Gdynia and Rumia) Located in the Gdańsk Bay Area During Periods of Intense Smog in Poland, 12, pp. 879–890. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health.
 
64.
Wojtasik, K., Horák, V. (2019). Do-it-Yourself Terrorism. How do Terrorist Organizations Inspire, Support, and Educate their European Supporters via the Internet? 7th International Conference Security System: Man – Technical Object – Environment, CzOTO 2018. Zakopane, Poland – December 12–14, 2018.
 
65.
World Health Organization. (2004). Public Health Response to Biological and Chemical Weapons: WHO Guidelines. World Health Organization.
 
66.
Yang, S., Rothman, R.E. (2004). PCR-based Diagnosis in Infectious Diseases: Applications, Limitations, and Future Applications in the Acute Care Setting. Lancet Infectious Diseases.
 
67.
Yeh, K.B., Wood, H., Scullion, M., Russell, J.A., Parker, K., Gnade, B.T., Jones, A.R., Whittier, Ch., Mereish, K. (2019). Molecular Detection of Biological Agents in the Field: Then and Now, 4(6). ASM Journals Sphere.
 
68.
Yuris, S. (2018). Advances in Sensors, 5(16). Reviews. Lulu.com.
 
69.
Zhenqiang, Xu, Yan, Wu, Fangxia, Shen, Qi, Chen (2011). Bioaerosol Science, Technology, and Engineering: Past, Present, and Future, 45, pp. 1337–1349. Aerosol Science and Technology.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top