ORIGINAL PAPER
Between curiosity and uncertainty: artificial intelligence in the social perception of seniors. A qualitative analysis
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Social Sciences
 
2
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2026-05-02
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-09-03
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-09-24
 
 
Publication date: 2026-10-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Majka Łojko   

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences
 
 
JoMS 2026;67(3):608-624
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of this article is to analyze the social perception of AI among people aged 60+ and identify the educational and social factors shaping their knowledge and attitudes towards this technology.

Material and methods:
The study employed a qualitative research strategy. Empirical data were collected through individual interviews with people aged 60 and over. The study sample consisted of 10 participants, including 5 women aged 60–68 and 5 men aged 62–70, who differed in terms of educational background and experience in using AI tools. The collected data were subjected to analytical induction, which made it possible to isolate the dominant ways of defining AI, sources of knowledge about it, experiences related to digital technologies and assessments of its social consequences.

Results:
The conducted research results in conclusions not only of a cognitive nature, but also of a practical and directional nature. Qualitative analyses indicate that the knowledge of the surveyed seniors about AI is based primarily on media messages and indirect experiences.

Conclusions:
Therefore, it is important to undertake systemic activities in the field of information and education aimed at developing the digital competences of seniors to strengthen their participation in technological transformation processes.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Batorski, D. (2015). Technologie i media w domach i życiu Polaków. W: J. Czapiński, T. Panek (red.), Diagnoza społeczna 2015. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków (s. 373–395). Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.
 
2.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
 
3.
Czaczkowska, E.K. (2023). Seniorzy jako użytkownicy nowych technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, 120–142.
 
4.
Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model. Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855.
 
5.
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J. (2006). Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352,DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
 
6.
Fast, E., Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1), 963–969,https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v....
 
7.
Friemel, T.N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331, DOI: 10.1177/1461444814538648.
 
8.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2023). Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce w 2023 roku, Warszawa–Szczecin 2023.
 
9.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2026). Sytuacja społeczno-gospodarcza kraju, https://ssgk.stat.gov.pl/Ludno... (dostęp: 11.03.2026).
 
10.
Heart, T., Kalderon, E. (2013). Older Adults: Are They Ready to Adopt Health-Related ICT?. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), 209–231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme... (dostęp: 1.03.2026).
 
11.
Korpela, V., Pajula, L., Hänninen, R. (2023). Older Adults Learning Digital Skills Together: Peer Tutors’ Perspectives on Non-Formal Digital Support. Media and Communication, 11(3), 53–62,https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v....
 
12.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (2000). Analiza danych jakościowych. Białystok: Trans Humana (wyd. polskie).
 
13.
Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 19. PMID: 24529817.
 
14.
Różanowski, K. (2007). Sztuczna inteligencja: rozwój, szanse i zagrożenia. Zeszyty Naukowe Warszawskiej Wyższej Szkoły Informatyki, 2, 109–135.
 
15.
Russell, S., Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
 
16.
Rubacha, K. (2016). Metodologia badań nad edukacją. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Editions Spotkania.
 
17.
Santos Urbina, G., Tur, G., Fernández, I. (2022). Active ageing with digital technology: Seniors’ usages and attitudes. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal – IxD&A, 54, 54–84, DOI:10.55612/s-5002-054-003.
 
18.
Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, v18, 369–384,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagi....
 
19.
Seniorzy w świecie cyfrowych finansów. Raport z badania. Edycja V. (2024), https://www.wib.org.pl/raport-... (dostęp: 10.03.2026).
 
20.
van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(1), 136–138, DOI:10.1002/asi.24355.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top