Labour incomes and economic activity in Poland
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Economics and Finance Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
 
 
Submission date: 2023-04-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-11-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-11-20
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Adam Koronowski   

Institute of Economics and Finance Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
 
 
JoMS 2023;53(4):206-221
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The purpose of the paper is to examine the impact of labour incomes on economic activity and growth in Poland.

Material and methods:
The thesis of the paper is rooted in the hypothesis of underconsumption and it claims that a proportion of labour incomes to the domestic product exerts an influence on the structure and the value of the aggregate demand and thus it eventually has an effect on economic activity. Empirical analysis provided refers to macroeconomic data for the period 2010-2019.

Results:
The results support the thesis; relatively low growth of labour incomes is followed by low rates of economic growth and investment and higher rates of unemployment.

Conclusions:
The analysis of changes in real production per employee, real wages, the rate of unemployment, the rate of GDP growth and changes in households’ consumption spending strongly support the claim that low wages at least periodically stand behind a demand constraint in the Polish economy and that they impair economic results.

 
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality – What Can Be Done?, Harvard University Press.
 
2.
Baran, P. A., P. M. Sweezy (1968), Monopoly Capital, an Essay on the American Economic and Social Order, Modern Reader Paperbacks.
 
3.
Backhouse, R.E., M. Boianovsky (2016). Secular stagnation: The history of a macroeconomic heresy, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Volume 23, 2016 – Issue 6.
 
4.
Berg, A.G., Ostry, J. D. (2011). Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin?, IMF Staff Discussion Note, April 2011.
 
5.
Berg, A., Ostry, J.D., Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth, IMF Staff Discussion Note, April 2014.
 
6.
Berg, J. (ed.) (2015). Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality, Building Just Societies in the 21st Century, Edward Elgar Publishing and ILO.
 
7.
Crouch, C. (2009). Privatized Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy Regime, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, Volume 11, Issue 3, August 2009.
 
8.
Dabla-Norris, E., K. Kochhar, N. Suphaphiphat, F. Ricka, E. Tsounta (2015). Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective, IMF Staff Discussion Notes No. 15/1.3.
 
9.
Diallo, M.B., P. Flashel, K.-M. Krolzig, C.R. Proano (2011). Reconsidering the dynamic interaction between real wages and macroeconomic activity, Research in World Economy, vol. 2, no. 1, April.
 
10.
GUS. (2015), Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej 2015, GUS.
 
11.
GUS. (2015a), Środki trwałe w gospodarce narodowej w 2014 roku, GUS.
 
12.
GUS. (2017), Środki trwałe w gospodarce narodowej w 2016 roku, GUS.
 
13.
GUS. (2022), Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej 2022, GUS.
 
14.
GUS. (2022a), Inwestycje i środki trwałe w gospodarce narodowej w latach 2017-2020, GUS.
 
15.
European Commission. (2020). Labour costs in the EU, Eurostat Newsrealease, nr 52/2020, 31 March 2020.
 
16.
Hansen, A.H. (1939). Economic progress and declining population growth, American Economic Review, March 1939.
 
17.
ILO, OECD. (2015). The Labour S.hare in G20 Economies, Report prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group (Turkey, 26-27 February 2015).
 
18.
Kalecki, M. (1935). Istota poprawy koniunkturalnej, za: Michał Kalecki, Kapitalizm: dynamika gospodarcza i pełne zatrudnienie, wybór tekstów pod red. K. Łaskiego i J. Osiatyńskiego, iTON Society.
 
19.
Kalecki, M. (1986). Teoria dynamiki gospodarczej, 3 edition, PWN.
 
20.
Koronowski, A. (2016). Technological Progress and Unemployment: Luddism and Beyond, Gospodarka Narodowa nr 4/2016.
 
21.
Koronowski, A. (2018). Czy niski udział płac w PKB prowadzi do stagnacji?; hipoteza niedostatecznego popytu konsumpcyjnego, Gospodarka Narodowa nr 4/2018.
 
22.
Koronowski, A. (2020). Epistemologia, aksjologia i ideologia w ekonomii; przypadek funkcji Cobba-Douglasa, Ekonomista nr 5/2020, http://www.pte.pl/pliki/1/8905....
 
23.
Koronowski, A. (2021). Stagnacja sekularna – stara herezja czy nowy paradygmat, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UKSW.
 
24.
Kumhof, M., Ranciere, R. (2010). Inequality, Leverage and Crises, IMF Working Paper WP/10/268.
 
25.
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (2004). The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future, 2003 Annual Report Essay, The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
 
26.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). Enterpreneurial State, Anthem Press.
 
27.
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality, A New Approach for the Age of Globalization, Harvard University Press.
 
28.
NBP. (2016). Potencjał innowacyjny gospodarki: uwarunkowania, determinanty, perspektywy.
 
29.
NBP. (A. Kolasa). (2017). Sytuacja finansowa sektora gospodarstw domowych w I kw. 2017 r.
 
30.
OECD. (2012). Labour Loosing to Capital: What Explains the Declining Labour Share?, OECD Employment Outlook 2012.
 
31.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press.
 
32.
Rajan, R. (2010). Fault Lanes: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy, Princeton University Press.
 
33.
Richardson, S. (2017). Central Bankers Face a Crisis of Confidence as Models Fail, MarketViews, Oct. 16, 2017, https://www.marketviews.com/rm... (access 24.04.2023).
 
34.
Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality, W. W. Norton.
 
35.
Teulings C. N., Baldwin, R. E. (2014). Secular stagnation: Facts, causes, and cures – a new Vox ebook, VoxEU.org, September 10,2014, https://voxeu.org/article/secu... (access 5.01.2023).
 
36.
Zingales, L. (2012). A Capitalism for the People: Recapturing the Lost Genius of American Prosperity, Basic Books.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top