Forensic accounting and fraud prevention in Indonesia public sector
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Pajajaran, Bandung, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Economics, The State University of Malang, Indonesia
Publication date: 2018-07-03
 
JoMS 2013;19(4):419–433
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Today, forensic accounting is a highly talked about topic all over the world and is the fastest growing area of accounting. The importance of professional forensic accountant cannot be over emphasized, especially to the public sector. The purpose of this study is to examine forensic accounting as a tool for fraud detection and prevention in the public sector organizations with particular reference to Indonesia. Both primary and secondary sources of data were appropriately used. 200 questionnaires were administered to staff of four (4) ministries in Indonesiawhich included into the top 10 of integrity survey of public sectorheld by Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), along with interviews conducted with those ministries out of which 173 were filled and returned. Tables and simple percentages were used to analyze the data. The statistical tool used to test hypotheses was Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA). Among the findings was that the use of forensic accounting do significantly reduces the occurrence of fraud cases in the public sector. Therefore the use of forensic accountants can help better in detecting and preventing fraud cases in the public sector organizations in Indonesia. (Study in Indonesia Ministry which included as the biggest 10 indicatef by the result of public integrity survey by Indonesia anti-corruption commission).
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 2012. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Austin: ACFE.
 
2.
Black, H. C. 1990. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group.
 
3.
Bologna J. and Lindquist, R. 1995. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. New York: Wiley and Sons.
 
4.
Braithwaite, J. 1985. White Collar Crime. Annual Review of Sociology, No. 11.
 
5.
Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines 2011. Barton: Attorney-General’s Department.
 
6.
Crumbley, D.L. and Aposolou, N.G. 2005. The Expanding Role of the Forensic Accountant. The Forensic Examiner, Vol. 14, No. 3.
 
7.
Degboro, D. and Olofinsola,J. 2007. Forensic Accountants and the Litigation Support Engagement. NigerAccount, Vol. 40, No. 2.
 
8.
Dhar, P. and Sarkar, A. 2010. Forensic Accounting: An Accountant’s Vision. Vidyasagar University Journal of Commerce, Vol. 15, No. 3.
 
9.
Friedrichs, D. O. 2007. Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society, 3rd Ed.. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
 
10.
Hansen, L.L. 2009. Corporate Financial Crime: Social Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 16, No. 1.
 
11.
Houck M., Kranacher, M., Moris B., and Robertson, J. 2006. Forensic Accounting as an Investigative Tool: Developing and Model Curriculum for Fraud and Forensic Accounting.The CPA Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5.
 
12.
KPMG.2010. Fraud and Misconduct Survey 2010. Melbourne: KPMG.
 
13.
Krell, E. 2002. Will Forensic Accounting go Mainstream?.Business Finance Journal, Vol. 8. No. 5.
 
14.
Ramaswamy, V. 2007. New Frontiers: Training Forensic Accountans within The Accounting Program. Journal of Collage Teaching and Learning. Vol. 2, No. 9.
 
15.
Sutherland, E. 1983. White-Collar Crime: The Uncut Version. London: Yale University Press.
 
16.
Transparency International. 2012. Corruption Perception Index 2012. http://www.ey.com/Publication/... Juni 2013].
 
17.
Transparency International. 2012. The 2011 Bribe Payers Index. http://bpi.transparency.org/bp... [12 Juni 2013].
 
18.
Tuanakotta T. M. 2010. Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif, Edisi 2.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031